Preliminary results of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) after fellowship training and experience in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP)

被引:31
作者
Wolanski, Philippe [1 ]
Chabert, Charles [2 ,3 ]
Jones, Lee [4 ]
Mullavey, Tarryn [2 ]
Walsh, Sharon [5 ]
Gianduzzo, Troy [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Dept Urol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Wesley Hosp Brisbane, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Bond Univ, Bond Med Sch, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[4] Queensland Inst Med Res, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
[5] Laparoscop Urol Australia, Gold Coast, Australia
关键词
robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; laparoscopic radical prostatectomy; learning curve; surgical outcomes; LEARNING-CURVE; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; SURGEON; COMPLICATIONS; RECURRENCE; PROPOSAL; CANCER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11479.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To ascertain whether prior experience in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) shortens the learning curve and therefore improves early patient outcomes when transitioning to robot-assisted laparoscopic RP (RALP). Patients and methods Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of the most recent 87 cases of LRP compared with the initial 73 cases of RALP. LRP was performed via a five-port extraperitoneal approach, while transperitoneal RALP was performed using a four-arm da Vinci S unit. Results The median operative duration for RALP (skin-to-skin, including docking time) rapidly reduced, although never exceeded 3.5 h, for each consecutive set of 10 cases. Oncological outcomes were preserved with no cases of pT2 positive surgical margins (PSMs) in any group. pT3 PSM rates were not significantly different at 50% and 38% for LRP and RALP, respectively. Penetrative intercourse rates at 3 months for bilateral nerve-sparing procedures in preoperatively potent patients were similar, at 50% for LRP (median Sexual Health Inventory for Men [SHIM] 17) and 48.1% for RALP (median SHIM 18). The pad-free rate at 3 months was significantly better for RALP at 59.7%, compared with 39.8% for LRP (P= 0.043). Complications were minimal and comparable for the two groups except for a higher LRP radiological anastomotic leak rate of 16 vs 1% (P= 0.004). Conclusion In this comparative series fellowship training and prior experience in LRP resulted in no significant RALP learning curve with regards to oncological and functional outcomes, while maintaining a low complication rate. A short learning curve existed for operative duration but this improved rapidly and there were no prolonged cases. Differences in early continence and radiological leaks may reflect changing from an interrupted anastomosis (LRP) to a continuous anastomosis with posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction (RALP).
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 70
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: Initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Ahlering, TE ;
Skarecky, D ;
Lee, D ;
Clayman, RV .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (05) :1738-1741
[2]   Robotic prostatectomy: A review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches [J].
Berryhill, Roy, Jr. ;
Jhaveri, Jay ;
Yadav, Rajiv ;
Leung, Robert ;
Rao, Sandhya ;
El-Hakim, Assaad ;
Tewari, Ashutosh .
UROLOGY, 2008, 72 (01) :15-23
[3]   Influence of Modified Posterior Reconstruction of the Rhabdosphincter on Early Recovery of Continence and Anastomotic Leakage Rates after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Coelho, Rafael F. ;
Chauhan, Sanket ;
Orvieto, Marcelo A. ;
Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan ;
Palmer, Kenneth J. ;
Coughlin, Geoff ;
Patel, Vipul R. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (01) :72-80
[4]   Outcomes of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy [J].
Dasgupta, Prokar ;
Kirby, Roger S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 16 (03) :244-248
[5]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[6]   Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years [J].
Doumerc, Nicolas ;
Yuen, Carlo ;
Savdie, Richard ;
Rahman, M. Bayzidur ;
Rasiah, Kris K. ;
Pe Benito, Ruth ;
Delprado, Warick ;
Matthews, Jayne ;
Haynes, Anne-maree ;
Stricker, Phillip D. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (03) :378-384
[7]  
Egevad L., HANDLING STAGING RAD
[8]   Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative Studies [J].
Ficarra, Vincenzo ;
Novara, Giacomo ;
Artibani, Walter ;
Cestari, Andrea ;
Galfano, Antonio ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio ;
Guillonneau, Bertrand ;
Menon, Mani ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Patel, Vipul ;
Rassweiler, Jens ;
Van Poppel, Hendrik .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (05) :1037-1063
[9]  
Gianduzzo TRJ, 2010, BJU INT, V105, P26
[10]   Direct Comparison of Surgical and Functional Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Versus Pure Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Single-Surgeon Experience [J].
Hakimi, A. Ari ;
Blitstein, Jeffrey ;
Feder, Marc ;
Shapiro, Edan ;
Ghavamian, Reza .
UROLOGY, 2009, 73 (01) :119-123