Employee engagement and emotional exhaustion of fly-in-fly-out workers: A diary study

被引:28
作者
Albrecht, Simon L. [1 ]
Anglim, Jeromy [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Psychol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
diary study; emotional exhaustion; job demands; job resources; work engagement; PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT; JOB DEMANDS; PERSONAL RESOURCES; DAILY FLUCTUATIONS; BURNOUT; HEALTH; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; METAANALYSIS; EMPOWERMENT;
D O I
10.1111/ajpy.12155
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
ObjectiveAlthough fly-in-fly-out (FIFO) work practices are widely used, little is known about their impact on the motivation and wellbeing of FIFO workers across the course of their work cycles. Drawing from the job demands-resources model, we aimed to test for the within-person effects of time of work cycle, job demands, and job resources on emotional exhaustion and employee engagement at 3-day intervals. MethodA total of 52 FIFO workers filled out three or more online diary surveys after every 3 days of their on-site work roster. The survey consisted of items drawn from previously validated scales. Bayesian hierarchical modelling of the day-level data was conducted. ResultsWorkers, on average, showed a decline in engagement and supervisor support, and an increase in emotional demand over the course of the work cycle. The results of the hierarchical modelling showed that day-level autonomy predicted day-level engagement and that day-level workload and emotional demands predicted emotional exhaustion. ConclusionsThe findings highlight the importance of managing FIFO employees' day-to-day experiences of job demands and job resources because of their influence on employee engagement and emotional exhaustion. To best protect FIFO worker day-level wellbeing, employing organisations should ensure optimal levels of job autonomy, workload, and emotional demands. Practical implications, study limitations and areas for future research are outlined.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 75
页数:10
相关论文
共 70 条
[51]   Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? [J].
Schaufeli, Wilmar B. ;
Taris, Toon W. ;
Van Rhenen, Willem .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 2008, 57 (02) :173-203
[52]   The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire - A cross-national study [J].
Schaufeli, Wilmar B. ;
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Salanova, Marisa .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2006, 66 (04) :701-716
[53]   Daily fluctuations in teachers' well-being: a diary study using the Job Demands-Resources model [J].
Simbula, Silvia .
ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING, 2010, 23 (05) :563-584
[54]   Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work [J].
Sonnentag, S .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (03) :518-528
[55]  
SPREITZER GM, 1995, ACAD MANAGE J, V38, P1442, DOI 10.5465/256865
[56]   Psychosocial work environment and mental health - a meta-analytic review [J].
Stansfeld, Stephen ;
Candy, Bridget .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2006, 32 (06) :443-462
[57]  
Storey Keith, 2010, Sustainability, V2, P1161, DOI 10.3390/su2051161
[58]   Booster Breaks: An Easy-to-Implement Workplace Policy Designed to Improve Employee Health, Increase Productivity, and Lower Health Care Costs [J].
Taylor, Wendell .
JOURNAL OF WORKPLACE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, 2011, 26 (01) :70-84
[59]  
Tetrick LE, 2014, STRESS QUAL WORK LIF, P25
[60]   Daily job crafting and the self-efficacy - performance relationship [J].
Tims, Maria ;
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Derks, Daantje .
JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 29 (05) :490-507