Collaborative learning: Elements encouraging and hindering deep approach to learning and use of elaboration strategies

被引:16
作者
Goncalves Pires, Elda Maria Stafuzza [1 ]
Daniel-Filho, Durval Anibal [1 ]
de Nooijer, Jascha [1 ]
Dolmans, Diana H. J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fac Israelita Ciencias Saude Albert Einstein FICS, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Collaborative; peer-to-peer; education environment; general; small group; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1080/0142159X.2020.1801996
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Aim The purpose of this research was to investigate students' approaches to learning and use of cognitive strategies in a collaborative learning environment with team-based learning. Method In a mixed-methods study, 263 medical students from 6 different semesters answered the R-SPQ-2F Questionnaire and MSLQ's items that measure elaboration and rehearsal strategies. ANOVA was used to compare differences between semesters, and Pearson's correlation to investigate how approaches to learning, cognitive strategies, and academic achievement correlate. Focus groups elucidated which elements in the collaborative learning environment enhanced or hindered deep approach to learning or elaboration strategies and why. Results Students took a deep approach to learning and sometimes a surface approach. They used elaboration and rehearsal strategies. First semester's students had significantly higher deep approach than fifth and sixth semesters' students. Elaboration strategies significantly correlated with final grade. Commitment to the group, case discussions, feeling challenged by teachers, and patients' visits were perceived to enhance deep approach to learning and use of elaboration strategies, while overload in course activities hindered deep approach to learning. Conclusions Particular elements of the learning environment triggered students to take deep approach to learning and use elaboration strategies, and this positively correlated to academic achievement.
引用
收藏
页码:1261 / 1269
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, TEAMBASED LEARNING H
  • [2] Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness
    Baeten, Marlies
    Kyndt, Eva
    Struyven, Katrien
    Dochy, Filip
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2010, 5 (03) : 243 - 260
  • [3] APPROACHES TO LEARNING, THEIR CONTEXT AND RELATIONSHIP TO ASSESSMENT PERFORMANCE
    BECKWITH, JB
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION, 1991, 22 (01) : 17 - 30
  • [4] The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F
    Biggs, J
    Kember, D
    Leung, DYP
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 71 : 133 - 149
  • [5] Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment
    Biggs, J
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION, 1996, 32 (03) : 347 - 364
  • [6] A Critical Discussion of Deep and Surface Processing: What It Means, How It Is Measured, the Role of Context, and Model Specification
    Dinsmore, Daniel L.
    Alexander, Patricia A.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 24 (04) : 499 - 567
  • [7] Problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research
    Dolmans, DHJM
    De Grave, W
    Wolfhagen, IHAP
    van der Vleuten, CPM
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 39 (07) : 732 - 741
  • [8] How theory and design-based research can mature PBL practice and research
    Dolmans, Diana H. J. M.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2019, 24 (05) : 879 - 891
  • [9] Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature
    Dolmans, Diana H. J. M.
    Loyens, Sofie M. M.
    Marcq, Helene
    Gijbels, David
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2016, 21 (05) : 1087 - 1112
  • [10] The relationship between students' approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes
    Gijbels, D
    Van de Watering, G
    Dochy, F
    Van den Bossche, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2005, 20 (04) : 327 - 341