Effects of agricultural land consolidation on ecosystem services: Trade-offs and synergies

被引:99
作者
Zhong, Lina [1 ]
Wang, Jun [2 ]
Zhang, Xiao [2 ]
Ying, Lingxiao [2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ Finance & Econ, Business Sch, Tianjin 300222, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources, Land Consolidat & Rehabil Ctr, Key Lab Land Consolidat & Rehabil, Beijing 100035, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecosystem services trade-off; Drivers; Crop production capacity; Carbon storage; Soil conservation; IMPACTS; SUSTAINABILITY; LANDSCAPE; PROJECT; SOIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121412
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agricultural land consolidation (ALC) has been used as an important and efficient development tool to improve agricultural production worldwide for decades, with numerous impacts on the ecological environment. How to coordinate the tradeoff relationships of agricultural production and other ecosystem services is a great challenge. Taking Jianxi Watershed in Fujian Province as an example, it was estimated three ecosystem services (crop production capacity, carbon storage, and soil conservation) and quantified the synergies and trade-offs among these three ecosystem services. Twenty-three factors were used to evaluate the influential mechanism of ALC on synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services. The results demonstrated that (1) from 2010 to 2016, the relationship between crop production capacity and carbon storage evolved from a synergistic to a trade-off relationship, while that between crop production capacity and soil conservation developed from a trade-off to a synergistic relationship; (2) after ALC, the strength of trade-offs between crop production capacity and soil conservation decreased from 0.354 to 0.198. However, the strength of trade-offs between soil conservation and carbon storage and that between crop production capacity and carbon storage increased from 0.302 to 0.322; and (3) the trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services changed due to changes in ALC measures. Finally, some suggestions of ALC measures were put forward to promote balanced and efficient development of various ecosystem services. ALC, considering trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services, and if applied sensitively, may be an instrument for delivering sustainable rural development in a wider context. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Measuring social-ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services [J].
Andersson, E. ;
Barthel, S. ;
Ahrne, K. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2007, 17 (05) :1267-1278
[2]  
[Anonymous], USDA ARS AGR HDB
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Econ. Geogr
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[5]   Ecosystem properties, potentials and services - The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example [J].
Bastian, Olaf ;
Haase, Dagmar ;
Grunewald, Karsten .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 :7-16
[6]   Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services [J].
Bennett, Elena M. ;
Peterson, Garry D. ;
Gordon, Line J. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (12) :1394-1404
[7]   Where to plant urban trees? A spatially explicit methodology to explore ecosystem service tradeoffs [J].
Bodnaruk, E. W. ;
Kroll, C. N. ;
Yang, Y. ;
Hirabayashi, S. ;
Nowak, D. J. ;
Endreny, T. A. .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2017, 157 :457-467
[8]   Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management [J].
Bradford, John B. ;
D'Amato, Anthony W. .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (04) :210-216
[9]   The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].
Costanza, R ;
dArge, R ;
deGroot, R ;
Farber, S ;
Grasso, M ;
Hannon, B ;
Limburg, K ;
Naeem, S ;
ONeill, RV ;
Paruelo, J ;
Raskin, RG ;
Sutton, P ;
vandenBelt, M .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :253-260
[10]   Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation [J].
Daily, Gretchen C. ;
Matson, Pamela A. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (28) :9455-9456