Two-Stage Entity Alignment: Combining Hybrid Knowledge Graph Embedding with Similarity-Based Relation Alignment

被引:12
作者
Jiang, Tingting [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bu, Chenyang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Yi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Xindong [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Knowledge Engn Big Data, Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Informat Engn, Hefei, Peoples R China
[3] Hefei Univ Technol, Inst Big Knowledge Sci, Hefei, Peoples R China
[4] Mininglamp Acad Sci, Mininglamp Technol, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
PRICAI 2019: TRENDS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PT I | 2019年 / 11670卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Entity alignment; Knowledge graph embedding; Relation alignment;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-29908-8_13
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Entity alignment aims to automatically determine whether an entity pair in different knowledge graphs refers to the same entity in reality. Existing entity alignment methods can be classified into two categories: string-similarity-based methods and embedding-based methods. String-similarity-based methods have higher accuracy, however, they might have difficulty in dealing with literal heterogeneity, i.e., an entity pair in diverse forms. Though embedding-based entity alignment can deal with literal heterogeneity, they also suffer the shortcomings of higher time complexity and lower accuracy. Moreover, there remain limitations and challenges due to only using the structure information of triples for existing embedding methods. Therefore, in this study, we propose a two-stage entity alignment framework, which can combine the advantages of both methods. In addition, to enhance the embedding performance, a hybrid knowledge graph embedding model with both fact triples and logical rules is introduced for entity alignment. Experimental results on two real-world datasets show that the proposed method is significantly better than the state-of-the-art embedding-based entity alignment methods.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 175
页数:14
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, J. Inf. Comput. Sci.
[2]  
Bordes A, 2013, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR, V26
[3]  
Chen M., 2016, P IJCAI, P1511
[4]  
Galárraga L, 2015, VLDB J, V24, P707, DOI 10.1007/s00778-015-0394-1
[5]  
Jin HM, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 56TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS (ACL), VOL 1, P2439
[6]  
Klabunde R., 2002, Z F UR SPRACHWISSENS, V21, P134
[7]  
Lacoste-Julien S, 2013, 19TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING (KDD'13), P572
[8]  
Lin Y., 2015, Modeling relation paths for representation learning of knowledge bases
[9]  
Mikolov T., 2013, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, V26, P1
[10]  
Ngomo Axel-Cyrille Ngonga, 2011, 22 INT JOINT C ART I, P2312, DOI [DOI 10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-385, 10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-385]