Complainant issues in research misconduct: The Office of Research Integrity experience

被引:0
作者
Pascal, Chris B. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Off Res Integr, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
关键词
Office of Research Integrity; research misconduct; complainant; retaliation; confidentiality; allegation of misconduct;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the experiences of the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) with issues involving complainants who make allegations of research misconduct. The paper describes the legal framework for complainant issues, the various roles of the complainant as the allegation of misconduct proceeds through the steps of investigation and resolution, how allegations of retaliation against the complainant are handled, the responsibilities of ORI and of the research institution where the alleged misconduct occurred, and ORI's experience with several cases of alleged retaliation. In each of these areas, the paper attempts to provide guidance to prospective complainants, research institutions, and other interested persons on effective ways to approach the various problems and concerns that arise, while maintaining a balance between the needs of the complainant, the accused, the research institution handling the allegation, and ORI.
引用
收藏
页码:1264 / 1270
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Perceptions and Attitudes about Research Integrity and Misconduct: a Survey among Young Biomedical Researchers in Italy
    Alex Mabou Tagne
    Niccolò Cassina
    Alessia Furgiuele
    Elisa Storelli
    Marco Cosentino
    Franca Marino
    Journal of Academic Ethics, 2020, 18 : 193 - 205
  • [42] On the Experience and Implications of Legal Mechanisms Promoting Research Integrity of the US
    Wang, Yue
    Fei, Yanying
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT INNOVATION AND PUBLIC POLICY (ICMIPP 2012), VOLS 1-6, 2012, : 2148 - 2153
  • [43] Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research
    Hall, Jeremy
    Martin, Ben R.
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2019, 48 (02) : 414 - 427
  • [44] Misconduct in medical research: whose responsibility?
    Breen, KJ
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2003, 33 (04) : 186 - 191
  • [45] A review on the diverse types of research misconduct
    Rezaeian, Mohsen
    WORLD FAMILY MEDICINE, 2014, 12 (07): : 43 - 44
  • [46] Perception of Research Misconduct in a Spanish University
    Feenstra, Ramon A.
    Garcia, Carlota Carretero
    Nicolau, Emma Gomez
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC ETHICS, 2025, 23 (01) : 89 - 112
  • [47] Preparing Whistleblowers for Reporting Research Misconduct
    Bonito, Arthur J.
    Titus, Sandra L.
    Greene, Angela M.
    Amoozegar, Jacqueline
    Eicheldinger, Celia
    Wright, David E.
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2012, 19 (05): : 308 - 328
  • [48] Is it time to revise the definition of research misconduct?
    Resnik, David B.
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2019, 26 (02): : 123 - 137
  • [49] An International Study of Research Misconduct Policies
    Resnik, David B.
    Rasmussen, Lisa M.
    Kissling, Grace E.
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2015, 22 (05): : 249 - 266
  • [50] Developing a federal policy on research misconduct
    Francis, S
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 1999, 5 (02) : 261 - 272