The rise of large-scale marine protected areas: Conservation or geopolitics?

被引:100
作者
Leenhardt, Pierre [1 ]
Cazalet, Bertrand [1 ]
Salvat, Bernard [1 ]
Claudet, Joachim [1 ]
Feral, Francois [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Perpignan, Lab Excellence CORAIL, USR CNRS EPHE CRIOBE 3278, F-66860 Perpignan, France
关键词
GREAT-BARRIER-REEF; RESERVES; MANAGEMENT; WORLD; COSTS; BENEFITS; PROGRESS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.08.013
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
In the last two decades, increasing number of international agreements have challenged traditional MPA design and management by calling for the implementation of large-scale marine protected areas (LSMPAs) within national jurisdictions and into the high seas. Since 2004, ten LSMPAs were established representing more than 80% of the worldwide MPA coverage, most of them in the Pacific. Here we analysed the drivers behind the establishment of LSMPA. This recent phenomenon is mainly driven by political reasons due to international conservation targets and intense domestic and international advocacy. Although we still lack scientific studies showing the benefit or the effectiveness of large-scale conservation, scientists advocate protecting marine biodiversity in remote places as a precautionary approach. International conservation targets provided political motivation for LSMPA establishment enabling coastal states to benefit from several legal mechanisms to strengthen their sovereignties over sea spaces. The rise of LSMPAs boosted the awakening of indigenous communities at the international, national, cultural and political level. In some cases the conservation initiatives catalysed indigenous claims to preserve their traditional and future rights forcing States to make sovereignty compromises on traditional rights. Ultimately, LSMPAs raise many issues of enforcement, management costs and governance structure that may challenge their effectiveness. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 118
页数:7
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Opportunity costs: Who really pays for conservation? [J].
Adams, Vanessa M. ;
Pressey, Robert L. ;
Naidoo, Robin .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 143 (02) :439-448
[2]   Mind the gap Addressing the shortcomings of marine protected areas through large scale marine spatial planning [J].
Agardy, Tundi ;
di Sciara, Giuseppe Notarbartolo ;
Christie, Patrick .
MARINE POLICY, 2011, 35 (02) :226-232
[3]   Effects of a large-scale and offshore marine protected area on the demersal fish assemblage in the Southwest Atlantic [J].
Alemany, Daniela ;
Iribarne, Oscar O. ;
Acha, Eduardo M. .
ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2013, 70 (01) :123-134
[4]  
Apollis G., 1980, EMPRISE MARITIME
[5]   Marine spatial planning in the high seas [J].
Ardron, Jeff ;
Gjerde, Kristina ;
Pullen, Sian ;
Tilot, Virginie .
MARINE POLICY, 2008, 32 (05) :832-839
[6]   Customary management as precautionary and adaptive principles for protecting coral reefs in Oceania [J].
Aswani, S. ;
Albert, S. ;
Sabetian, A. ;
Furusawa, T. .
CORAL REEFS, 2007, 26 (04) :1009-1021
[7]   The worldwide costs of marine protected areas [J].
Balmford, A ;
Gravestock, P ;
Hockley, N ;
McClean, CJ ;
Roberts, CM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (26) :9694-9697
[8]   Promise and problems for estimating management costs of marine protected areas [J].
Ban, Natalie C. ;
Adams, Vanessa ;
Pressey, Robert L. ;
Hicks, John .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2011, 4 (03) :241-252
[9]   Spatial socioeconomic data as a cost in systematic marine conservation planning [J].
Ban, Natalie Corinna ;
Klein, Carissa Joy .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2009, 2 (05) :206-215
[10]  
Barbour Wayne, 2012, Ecological Management & Restoration, V13, P36, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2011.00632.x