Correcting effect sizes for score reliability: A reminder that measurement and substantive issues are linked inextricably

被引：55
作者：
Baugh, F [1 ]
机构：
[1] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
来源：
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT | 2002年 / 62卷 / 02期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1177/0013164402062002004
中图分类号：
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号：
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要：
The present article emphasizes that measurement issues must be explicitly considered even in studies that focus on substantive questions. First, dynamics associated with insufficient attention being paid to score reliabilities in substantive studies are discussed. Next, reasons to adjust effect size indices for score unreliability are presented. Finally, some procedures for adjusting effect sizes for score reliability are briefly reviewed.
引用
收藏
页码：254 / 263
页数：10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   GRADUATE TRAINING IN STATISTICS, METHODOLOGY, AND MEASUREMENT IN PSYCHOLOGY - A SURVEY OF PHD PROGRAMS IN NORTH-AMERICA [J].
AIKEN, LS ;
WEST, SG ;
SECHREST, L ;
RENO, RR ;
ROEDIGER, HL ;
SCARR, S ;
KAZDIN, AE ;
SHERMAN, SJ .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1990, 45 (06) :721-734
[2]  
American Psychological Association, 2016, ETH PRINC PSYCH COD
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, MULTIVAR APPL SER
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1984, Meta-analysis procedures for social research
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Educational and Psychological Measurement
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Advances in Educational Research
[7]  
[Anonymous], ED RES, DOI DOI 10.2307/1175221
[8]  
APA, 2001, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, V5th, DOI DOI 10.1037/0000165-000
[9]  
BAUGH F, 2001, J EDUC RES, V12, P120
[10]   MATHEMATICAL VS. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE [J].
Boring, Edwin G. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1919, 16 (10) :335-338
123456