Response time effectiveness: Comparison of response time and survival in an urban emergency medical services system

被引:142
作者
Blackwell, TH
Kaufman, JS
机构
[1] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Ctr Prehosp Med, Charlotte, NC 28232 USA
[2] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol, Charlotte, NC 28232 USA
[3] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Stat, Charlotte, NC 28232 USA
[4] Mecklenburg EMS Agcy, Charlotte, NC USA
关键词
prehospital; emergency medical services; response time; effectiveness; standards;
D O I
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01321.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Emergency medical services (EMS) administrators seek methods to enhance system performance. One component scrutinized is the response time (RT) interval between call receipt and arrival on scene. While reducing RTs may improve survival, this remains speculative and unreported. Objective: To determine the effect of current RTs on survival in an urban EMS system. Methods: The study was conducted in a metropolitan county (population 620,000). The EMS system is a single-tier, paramedic service and provides all service requests. The 90% fractile RT specifications required for county compliance include 10:59 minutes for emergency life-threatening calls (priority I) and 12:59 minutes for emergency non-life-threatening calls (priority II). All emergency responses resulting in a priority I or priority II transport to a Level 1 trauma center emergency department over a six-month period were evaluated to determine the relation between specified and arbitrarily assigned RTs and survival. Results: Five thousand, four hundred twenty-four transports were reviewed. Of these, 71 patients did not survive (1.31%; 95% CI = 1.04% to 1.67%). No significant difference in median RTs between survivors (6.4 min) and nonsurvivors (6.8 min) was noted (p = 0.10). Further, there was no significant difference between observed and expected deaths (p = 0.14). However, mortality risk was 1.58% for patients whose RT exceeded 5 minutes, and 0.51% for those whose RT was under 5 minutes (p = 0.002). The mortality risk curve was generally flat over RT intervals exceeding 5 minutes. Conclusions: In this observational study, emergency calls where RTs were less than 5 minutes were associated with improved survival when compared with calls where RTs exceeded 5 minutes. While variables other than time may be associated with this improved survival, there is little evidence in those data to suggest that changing this system's response time specifications to times less than current, but g eater than 5 minutes, would have any beneficial effect on survival.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 295
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] *AM AMB ASS, 1994, CONTR EM AMB SERV GU, P11
  • [2] Billittier AJ, 1996, ACAD EMERG MED, V3, P1046
  • [3] EMS SYSTEM PERFORMANCE - THE USE OF CARDIAC-ARREST TIMELINES
    BRAUN, O
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1993, 22 (01) : 52 - 61
  • [4] THE EMERGENT PROBLEM OF AMBULANCE MISUSE
    BROWN, E
    SINDELAR, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1993, 22 (04) : 646 - 650
  • [5] Measuring response intervals in a system with a 911 primary and an emergency medical services secondary public safety answering point
    Campbell, JP
    Gridley, TS
    Muelleman, RL
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1997, 29 (04) : 492 - 496
  • [6] ROBUST LOCALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION AND SMOOTHING SCATTERPLOTS
    CLEVELAND, WS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 74 (368) : 829 - 836
  • [7] *COMM ACCR AMB SER, 1997, 201 COMM ACCR AMB SE
  • [8] CUMMINS RO, 1991, ANN EMERG MED, V20, P861
  • [9] Circumstances and causes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in sudden death survivors
    de Vreede-Swagemakers, JJM
    Gorgels, APM
    Dubois-Arbouw, WI
    Dalstra, J
    Daemen, MJAP
    van Ree, JW
    Stijns, RE
    Wellens, HJJ
    [J]. HEART, 1998, 79 (04) : 356 - 361
  • [10] CARDIAC RESUSCITATION IN THE COMMUNITY - IMPORTANCE OF RAPID PROVISION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAM PLANNING
    EISENBERG, MS
    BERGNER, L
    HALLSTROM, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 241 (18): : 1905 - 1907