Finding a Comparison Group: Is Online Crowdsourcing a Viable Option?

被引:23
作者
Azzam, Tarek [1 ]
Jacobson, Miriam R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Claremont Grad Univ, Claremont, CA 91711 USA
关键词
matched comparison group; crowdsourcing; quasi-experimental design; experimental design; evaluation methods;
D O I
10.1177/1098214013490223
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article explores the viability of online crowdsourcing for creating matched-comparison groups. This exploratory study compares survey results from a randomized control group to survey results from a matched-comparison group created from Amazon.com's MTurk crowdsourcing service to determine their comparability. Study findings indicate that online crowdsourcing, a process that allows access to many participants to complete specific tasks, is a potentially viable resource for evaluation designs where access to comparison groups, large budgets, and/or time are limited. The article highlights the strengths and limitations of the online crowdsourcing approach and describes ways that it could potentially be used in evaluation practice.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 384
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, EXPT QUASIEXPERIMENT
  • [2] [Anonymous], COMMON FACTOR SOLUTI
  • [3] [Anonymous], WIRED MAGAZINE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, P 11 ACM C EL COMM 2
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, EXPT EC
  • [6] [Anonymous], CANADIAN J PROGRAM E
  • [7] The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research
    Behrend, Tara S.
    Sharek, David J.
    Meade, Adam W.
    Wiebe, Eric N.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2011, 43 (03) : 800 - 813
  • [8] Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
    Berinsky, Adam J.
    Huber, Gregory A.
    Lenz, Gabriel S.
    [J]. POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (03) : 351 - 368
  • [9] Bloom H. S., 2005, Learning more from social experiments, P173
  • [10] Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
    Buhrmester, Michael
    Kwang, Tracy
    Gosling, Samuel D.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) : 3 - 5