Peatland protection and restoration are key for climate change mitigation

被引:109
|
作者
Humpenoeder, Florian [1 ]
Karstens, Kristine [1 ,2 ]
Lotze-Campen, Hermann [1 ,2 ]
Leifeld, Jens [3 ]
Menichetti, Lorenzo [4 ]
Barthelmes, Alexandra [5 ]
Popp, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, Potsdam, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[3] Agroscope, Changins, Switzerland
[4] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[5] Greifswald Mire Ctr, Greifswald, Germany
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2020年 / 15卷 / 10期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
climate change mitigation; peatland protection; peatland restoration; land-based mitigation; mitigation pathway; large-scale bioenergy; peatland degradation; LAND; EMISSIONS; BIOENERGY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/abae2a
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Peatlands cover only about 3% the global land area, but store about twice as much carbon as global forest biomass. If intact peatlands are drained for agriculture or other human uses, peat oxidation can result in considerable CO(2)emissions and other greenhouse gases (GHG) for decades or even centuries. Despite their importance, emissions from degraded peatlands have so far not been included explicitly in mitigation pathways compatible with the Paris Agreement. Such pathways include land-demanding mitigation options like bioenergy or afforestation with substantial consequences for the land system. Therefore, besides GHG emissions owing to the historic conversion of intact peatlands, the increased demand for land in current mitigation pathways could result in drainage of presently intact peatlands, e.g. for bioenergy production. Here, we present the first quantitative model-based projections of future peatland dynamics and associated GHG emissions in the context of a 2 degrees C mitigation pathway. Our spatially explicit land-use modelling approach with global coverage simultaneously accounts for future food demand, based on population and income projections, and land-based mitigation measures. Without dedicated peatland policy and even in the case of peatland protection, our results indicate that the land system would remain a net source of CO(2)throughout the 21st century. This result is in contrast to the outcome of current mitigation pathways, in which the land system turns into a net carbon sink by 2100. However, our results indicate that it is possible to reconcile land use and GHG emissions in mitigation pathways through a peatland protectionandrestoration policy. According to our results, the land system would turn into a global net carbon sink by 2100, as projected by current mitigation pathways, if about 60% of present-day degraded peatlands would be rewetted in the coming decades, next to the protection of intact peatlands.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of peatland degradation, protection and restoration for climate change mitigation in the SSP scenarios
    Doelman, J. C.
    Verhagen, W.
    Stehfest, E.
    van Vuuren, D. P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH-CLIMATE, 2023, 2 (03):
  • [2] Peatland microalgae are unsung heroes of climate change mitigation
    Jassey, Vincent E. J.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2025, : 360 - 361
  • [3] Adaptation of restoration target with climate change: the case of a coastal peatland
    Guene-Nanchen, Melina
    D'Amour, Noemie
    Rochefort, Line
    BOTANY, 2020, 98 (08) : 439 - 448
  • [4] The opportunity cost of delaying climate action: Peatland restoration and resilience to climate change
    Glenk, Klaus
    Faccioli, Michela
    Martin-Ortega, Julia
    Schulze, Christoph
    Potts, Jacqueline
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2021, 70
  • [5] Land-use protection for climate change mitigation
    Popp, Alexander
    Humpenoeder, Florian
    Weindl, Isabelle
    Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon
    Bonsch, Markus
    Lotze-Campen, Hermann
    Mueller, Christoph
    Biewald, Anne
    Rolinski, Susanne
    Stevanovic, Miodrag
    Dietrich, Jan Philipp
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 4 (12) : 1095 - 1098
  • [6] Land-use protection for climate change mitigation
    Alexander Popp
    Florian Humpenöder
    Isabelle Weindl
    Benjamin Leon Bodirsky
    Markus Bonsch
    Hermann Lotze-Campen
    Christoph Müller
    Anne Biewald
    Susanne Rolinski
    Miodrag Stevanovic
    Jan Philipp Dietrich
    Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4 : 1095 - 1098
  • [7] Contributions of mangrove conservation and restoration to climate change mitigation in Indonesia
    Arifanti, Virni Budi
    Kauffman, John Boone
    Subarno
    Ilman, Muhammad
    Tosiani, Anna
    Novita, Nisa
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2022, 28 (15) : 4523 - 4538
  • [8] Restoration at the landscape scale as a means of mitigation and adaptation to climate change
    Betsy von Holle
    Stephanie Yelenik
    Elise S. Gornish
    Current Landscape Ecology Reports, 2020, 5 (3) : 85 - 97
  • [9] Ecological restoration and protection of remnants are key to the survival of the critically endangered Araucaria tree under climate change
    Bernardinis, Giulliana B.
    Cobos, Marlon E.
    Brum, Fernanda T.
    Marques, Marcia C. M.
    Peterson, A. Townsend
    Carlucci, Marcos B.
    Zwiener, Victor P.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2023, 47
  • [10] Peatland biodiversity and climate change
    T. Yu. Minayeva
    A. A. Sirin
    Biology Bulletin Reviews, 2012, 2 (2) : 164 - 175