The production of capitalist "smooth" space in global port operations

被引:13
作者
Wilmsmeier, Gordon [1 ]
Monios, Jason [2 ]
机构
[1] Bremen Univ Appl Sci, D-28199 Bremen, Germany
[2] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Transport Res Inst, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Ports; Terminals; Shipping lines; Post-Fordist; Globalisation; Networks; Spatial fix; Scalar fix; Post-structuralist; TERRITORIAL ORGANIZATION; GOVERNANCE REFORMS; LATIN-AMERICA; GEOGRAPHY; TRANSPORT; SEAPORTS; DEVOLUTION; EVOLUTION; POLITICS; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.06.016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
New developments in a post-Fordist economic environment have changed the source of port competitiveness from economies of scale based on basic production factors (capital, land, labour) to economies of scope based on advanced production (service) factors. The institutional setting in which ports are now embedded requires methods of analysis that go beyond those traditionally applied in transport geography, but port geography research has not embraced critical, radical or relational geographies. Thus, questions relating to the new conceptions of space and networks created through the corporatisation of the industry remain unanswered. This paper examines prevailing conceptualisations of space in port geography and elaborates the case for a smooth space conceptualisation. In doing so, it draws on two theoretical traditions of the spatial impacts of capital accumulation, beginning with Marx and Harvey to demonstrate how ports represent an exemplar of the inherently unstable "spatial fix" of mobile capital, then turning to the concept of "smooth space" introduced by Deleuze and Guattari. Using these concepts, the paper reflects on the production of capitalist smooth space in the global port operations sector, in which a handful of multinational corporations manage portfolios of major ports across the globe. The result is an inherent contradiction between a port's embeddedness in its local setting and regional hinterland and the expanding global corporatocracy driving its operational strategy. This paper argues, therefore, that port devolution and development cannot be understood in the absence of a critique of their capitalist context. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 69
页数:11
相关论文
共 119 条
  • [1] Beyond the territorial fix: Regional assemblages, politics and power
    Allen, John
    Cochrane, Allan
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2007, 41 (09) : 1161 - 1175
  • [2] Allen John., 1998, RETHINKING REGION
  • [3] Alphaliner, 2012, EV CARR FLEETS
  • [4] Amin A., 2004, GEOGR ANN B, V86, P33, DOI [10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00152.x, DOI 10.1111/J.0435-3684.2004.00152.X]
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2002, EMERGENCE PRIVATE AU
  • [6] Baird A., 2004, MARIT POLICY MANAG, V31, P375, DOI [10.1080/0308883042000304890, DOI 10.1080/0308883042000304890]
  • [7] Acquisition of UK ports by private equity funds
    Baird, Alfred J.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 8 : 158 - 165
  • [8] Barke M, 1986, Transport and Trade. Conceptual Frameworks in Geography
  • [9] Toward a relational economic geography
    Bathelt, H
    Glückler, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2003, 3 (02) : 117 - 144
  • [10] Bird JamesH., 1963, MAJOR SEAPORTS UK