The Best Marketing Strategy in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: Evaluating Patients' Preferences by Conjoint Analysis

被引:19
作者
Marsidi, Nick [1 ]
van den Bergh, Maurice W. H. M.
Luijendijk, Roland W.
机构
[1] Bergman Clin, NL-3723 MB Bilthoven, Netherlands
关键词
COSMETIC SURGERY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/01.prs.0000436528.78331.da
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To provide the best marketing strategy for a private clinic, knowledge of patients' preferences is essential. In marketing, conjoint analysis has been frequently used to calculate which attributes of a product are most valuable to consumers. Methods: This study investigates the relative importance of attributes that influence the selection and decision-making process when choosing an aesthetic private clinic, using conjoint analysis. The following attributes were chosen by the senior author (R.W.L.) and a marketing and communications director after a preselection of 25 randomly selected people: relative cost of the procedure, travel time, experience of the plastic surgeon, size of the clinic, method of referral, and online presentation. The attributes were then divided into levels. Using a random factor conducted by SPSS, 18 different scenarios were created and rated online by 150 potential patients before their potential visit or consultation. The patients could rate these scenarios on a scale from 1 to 7 with respect to the likeliness of visiting the clinic. Results: The most important attribute was experience of the surgeon (35.6 percent), followed by method of referral (21.5 percent), travel time (14.2 percent), cost of procedure (12.9 percent), online presentation (9.7 percent), and size of the clinic (6.1 percent). Six of 16 levels gave a negative influence on the decision making. Conclusions: The authors' study shows that the two most important attributes are the experience of the surgeon and the method of referral and that conjoint analysis is effective in determining patients' preferences. It also shows which levels positively or negatively contribute per attribute.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 57
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Bryan S, 1998, HEALTH ECON, V7, P595, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(1998110)7:7<595::AID-HEC381>3.3.CO
[2]  
2-5
[3]   The Marriage of Plastic Surgery and Social Media: A Relationship to Last a Lifetime [J].
Camp, Steven M. ;
Mills, Daniel C., II .
AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2012, 32 (03) :349-351
[4]   Social Networks Uncovered: 10 Tips Every Plastic Surgeon Should Know [J].
Dauwe, Phillip ;
Heller, Justin B. ;
Unger, Jacob G. ;
Graham, Darrell ;
Rohrich, Rod J. .
AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2012, 32 (08) :1010-1015
[5]   Factors Influencing Patient Interest in Plastic Surgery and the Process of Selecting a Surgeon [J].
Galanis, Charles ;
Sanchez, Ivan S. ;
Roostaeian, Jason ;
Crisera, Christopher .
AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2013, 33 (04) :585-590
[6]   Impact of the Current Economy on Facial Aesthetic Surgery [J].
Kurkjian, T. Jonathan ;
Kenkel, Jeffrey M. ;
Sykes, Jonathan M. ;
Duffy, Stephen C. .
AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2011, 31 (07) :770-774
[7]   Online Marketing Strategies of Plastic Surgeons and Clinics: A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom and the United States [J].
Nassab, Reza ;
Navsaria, Harshad ;
Myers, Simon ;
Frame, James .
AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2011, 31 (05) :566-571
[8]   Predatory Pricing in Plastic Surgery [J].
Prado, Arturo S. ;
Parada, Francisco ;
Andrades, Patricio .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 125 (02) :91E-91E
[9]   Patients' preferences regarding the process and outcomes of life-saving technology - An application of conjoint analysis to liver transplantation [J].
Ratcliffe, J ;
Buxton, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 15 (02) :340-351
[10]   So you are board-certified in plastic surgery: What it means in the new millennium [J].
Rohrich, RJ .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 105 (04) :1473-1474