Longitudinal profiles of health care providers

被引:28
作者
Bronskill, SE
Normand, SLT
Landrum, MB
Rosenheck, RA
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Dept Psychiat, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[5] Yale Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
hierarchical model; longitudinal analysis; Mahalanobis distance; quality of care; posterior probability; provider profiling;
D O I
10.1002/sim.1060
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Provider profiling is the activity of collecting, comparing and reporting quality of care measures for individuals, groups, agencies and institutions that provide health care services. Univariate provider profiles, such as hospital-specific mortality rates, have been constructed using cross-sectional data based on posterior summaries or maximum likelihood estimates. As data continue to be collected over time, the construction and interpretation of longitudinal profiles of health care providers will become increasingly important. Longitudinal series can be used to improve the precision of estimates - a feature that is particularly important for providers who treat a small number of patients per year. We extend and apply hierarchical models to examine and classify provider performance over time using two examples, one in the area of cardiology and the other in mental health. Performance is evaluated using the squared Mahalanobis distance and posterior probabilities based on this distance. By comparing providers based on level and temporal trend simultaneously, conservative but comprehensive assessments of performance are possible. Furthermore, the longitudinal profiles developed are easily interpreted and flexible, making them of practical use to policy-makers. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1067 / 1088
页数:22
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] AGIULAR O, 1998, CASE STUDIES BAYESIA, V4, P287
  • [2] A comparison of a Bayesian vs. a frequentist method for profiling hospital performance
    Austin, PC
    Naylor, CD
    Tu, JV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2001, 7 (01) : 35 - 45
  • [3] P values for composite null models
    Bayarri, MJ
    Berger, JO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 95 (452) : 1127 - 1142
  • [4] Bryk A.S., 1992, Hierarchical Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
  • [5] Medical profiling: improving standards and risk adjustments using hierarchical models
    Burgess, JF
    Christiansen, CL
    Michalak, SE
    Morris, CN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2000, 19 (03) : 291 - 309
  • [6] CHALONER K, 1994, ASPECTS UNCERTAINTY, P149
  • [7] VARIATIONS IN THE USE OF MEDICAL AND SURGICAL SERVICES BY THE MEDICARE POPULATION
    CHASSIN, MR
    BROOK, RH
    PARK, RE
    KEESEY, J
    FINK, A
    KOSECOFF, J
    KAHN, K
    MERRICK, N
    SOLOMON, DH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 314 (05) : 285 - 290
  • [8] Improving the statistical approach to health care provider profiling
    Christiansen, CL
    Morris, CN
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 127 (08) : 764 - 768
  • [9] Hierarchical generalized linear models in the analysis of variations in health care utilization
    Daniels, MJ
    Gatsonis, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (445) : 29 - 42
  • [10] DeLong ER, 1997, STAT MED, V16, P2645, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19971215)16:23<2645::AID-SIM696>3.0.CO