Validation studies of turbulence closure schemes for high resolutions in mesoscale meteorological models

被引:7
作者
Castelli, ST [1 ]
Hara, T
Ohba, R
Tremback, CJ
机构
[1] CNR, Inst Atmospher Sci & Climate, Turin, Italy
[2] Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Co Ltd, Fluid Dynam Lab, Nagasaki, Japan
[3] ATMET LLC, Boulder, CO USA
关键词
turbulence closures; mesoscale models; RAMS; non-homogenous conditions; experimental campaign;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.028
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mesoscale models are often used to reproduce the atmospheric processes at relatively high resolutions, both for meteorological and pollutant dispersion studies and applications. Particularly in non-homogeneous conditions, a proper description of turbulent transport is a fundamental aspect. In this work, we compare two analogous 1.5-order turbulence schemes implemented in RAMS, mainly differing in the form of the turbulent kinetic energy dynamical equation (1D or 3D) and in the relationships linking the closure quantities, such as diffusion coefficients and dissipation terms. We present results froth simulations performed in a simple, idealized case, along with results related to two field campaigns carried on in the Tsukuba region (Japan) in 1989 and 1990. Both turbulence schemes are able to well reproduce the mean flow, but different performances are related to the turbulence field. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2510 / 2523
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]   STRATOCUMULUS-CAPPED MIXED LAYERS DERIVED FROM A 3-DIMENSIONAL MODEL [J].
DEARDORFF, JW .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1980, 18 (04) :495-527
[12]   Simulation of meteorological fields within and above urban and rural canopies with a mesoscale model (MM5) [J].
Dupont, S ;
Otte, TL ;
Ching, JKS .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2004, 113 (01) :111-158
[13]   A prediction system for local wind variations in mountainous terrain [J].
Eidsvik, KJ ;
Holstad, A ;
Lie, I ;
Utnes, T .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2004, 112 (03) :557-586
[14]   Turbulence fields for atmospheric dispersion models in horizontally non-homogeneous conditions [J].
Ferrero, E ;
Castelli, ST ;
Anfossi, D .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (17) :2305-2315
[15]  
FERROR E, 2001, HYBRID METHODS ENG, V3, P11
[16]   An examination of the uncertainty in interpolated winds and its effect on the validation and intercomparison of forecast models [J].
Greene, JS ;
Cook, WE ;
Knapp, D ;
Haines, P .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 19 (03) :397-401
[17]  
GROSS G, 1994, METEOROL MONOGR, V57, P73
[18]   REPRESENTATIVENESS OF WIND MEASUREMENTS ON A MESOSCALE GRID WITH STATION SEPARATIONS OF 312M TO 10KM [J].
HANNA, SR ;
CHANG, JC .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1992, 60 (04) :309-324
[19]  
HANNA SR, 1994, METEOROL MONOGR, V57, P47
[20]  
HAYASHI T, 1999, JAERIDATACODE99036