Validation and clinical application of a targeted next-generation sequencing gene panel for solid and hematologic malignancies

被引:1
作者
Prieto-Potin, Ivan [1 ]
Carvajal, Nerea [1 ]
Plaza-Sanchez, Jenifer [1 ]
Manso, Rebeca [1 ]
Laura Auz-Alexandre, Carmen [1 ]
Chamizo, Cristina [1 ]
Zazo, Sandra [1 ]
Lopez-Sanchez, Almudena [1 ]
Maria Rodriguez-Pinilla, Socorro [1 ]
Camacho, Laura [2 ]
Longaron, Raquel [2 ]
Bellosillo, Beatriz [2 ]
Somoza, Rosa [3 ]
Hernandez-Losa, Javier [3 ]
Manuel Fernandez-Soria, Victor [4 ]
Ramos-Ruiz, Ricardo [4 ]
Cristobal, Ion [5 ]
Garcia-Foncillas, Jesus [5 ]
Rojo, Federico [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Jimenez Diaz Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, UAM, CIBERONC,Hlth Res Inst, Madrid, Spain
[2] Hosp del Mar, Dept Pathol, Med Res Inst, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Vall dHebron Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Genom Unit, Madrid Sci Pk, Madrid, Spain
[5] Fdn Jimenez Diaz Univ Hosp, Translat Oncol Div, UAM, Hlth Res Inst, Madrid, Spain
来源
PEERJ | 2020年 / 8卷
关键词
Next-generation sequencing; Validation; Cancer; Solid tumor; Hematological malignancies; JOINT-CONSENSUS-RECOMMENDATION; MOLECULAR-PATHOLOGY; PRECISION MEDICINE; SOMATIC VARIANTS; CELL LUNG; ASSAY; CANCER; IMPLEMENTATION; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.10069
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a high-throughput technology that has become widely integrated in molecular diagnostics laboratories. Among the large diversity of NGS-based panels, the Trusight Tumor 26 (TsT26) enables the detection of low-frequency variants across 26 genes using the MiSeq platform. Methods. We describe the inter-laboratory validation and subsequent clinical application of the panel in 399 patients presenting a range of tumor types, including gastrointestinal (GI, 29%), hematologic (18%), lung (13%), gynecological and breast (8% each), among others. Results. The panel is highly accurate with a test sensitivity of 92%, and demonstrated high specificity and positive predictive values (95% and 96%, respectively). Sequencing testing was successful in two-thirds of patients, while the remaining third failed due to unsuccessful quality-control filtering. Most detected variants were observed in the TP53 (28%), KRAS (16%), APC (10%) and PIK3CA (8%) genes. Overall, 372 variants were identified, primarily distributed as missense (81%), stop gain (9%) and frameshift (7%) altered sequences and mostly reported as pathogenic (78%) and variants of uncertain significance (19%). Only 14% of patients received targeted treatment based on the variant determined by the panel. The variants most frequently observed in GI and lung tumors were: KRAS c.35G > A(p.G12D), c.35G > T (p.G12V) and c.34G > T (p.G12C). Conclusions. Prior panel validation allowed its use in the laboratory daily practice by providing several relevant and potentially targetable variants across multiple tumors. However, this study is limited by high sample inadequacy rate, raising doubts as to continuity in the clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [41] Diagnostic Mutation Profiling and Validation of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Small Biopsy Samples using a High Throughput Platform
    Quinn, Anne Marie
    Hickson, Nicholas
    Adaway, Megan
    Priest, Lynsey
    Jaeger, Erich
    Udar, Nitin
    Keeling, Catherine
    Kamieniorz, Martyna
    Dive, Caroline
    Wallace, Andrew
    Byers, Richard J.
    Newman, William G.
    Nonaka, Daisuke
    Blackhall, Fiona H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10 (05) : 784 - 792
  • [42] Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology
    Richards, Sue
    Aziz, Nazneen
    Bale, Sherri
    Bick, David
    Das, Soma
    Gastier-Foster, Julie
    Grody, Wayne W.
    Hegde, Madhuri
    Lyon, Elaine
    Spector, Elaine
    Voelkerding, Karl
    Rehm, Heidi L.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 17 (05) : 405 - 424
  • [43] Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology
    Sepulveda, Antonia R.
    Hamilton, Stanley R.
    Allegra, Carmen J.
    Grody, Wayne
    Cushman-Vokoun, Allison M.
    Funkhouser, William K.
    Kopetz, Scott E.
    Lieu, Christopher
    Lindor, Noralane M.
    Minsky, Bruce D.
    Monzon, Federico A.
    Sargent, Daniel J.
    Singh, Veena M.
    Willis, Joseph
    Clark, Jennifer
    Colasacco, Carol
    Rumble, R. Bryan
    Temple-Smolkin, Robyn
    Ventura, Christina B.
    Nowak, Jan A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (13) : 1453 - +
  • [44] The Genomic Era of Clinical Oncology: Integrated Genomic Analysis for Precision Cancer Care
    Surrey, Lea F.
    Luo, Minjie
    Chang, Fengqi
    Li, Marilyn M.
    [J]. CYTOGENETIC AND GENOME RESEARCH, 2016, 150 (3-4) : 162 - 175
  • [45] Validation of a next-generation sequencing oncology panel optimized for low input DNA
    Sussman, Robyn T.
    Shaffer, Sydney
    Azzato, Elizabeth M.
    DeSloover, Daniel
    Farooqi, Midhat S.
    Meyer, Anders
    Lieberman, David B.
    Bigdeli, Ashkan
    Paolillo, Carmela
    Ganapathy, Karthik
    Sukhadia, Shrey
    Rosenbaum, Jason N.
    Daber, Robert D.
    Morrissette, Jennifer J. D.
    [J]. CANCER GENETICS, 2018, 228 : 55 - 63
  • [46] Cancer Genome Interpreter annotates the biological and clinical relevance of tumor alterations
    Tamborero, David
    Rubio-Perez, Carlota
    Deu-Pons, Jordi
    Schroeder, Michael P.
    Vivancos, Ana
    Rovira, Ana
    Tusquets, Ignasi
    Albanell, Joan
    Rodon, Jordi
    Tabernero, Josep
    de Torres, Carmen
    Dienstmann, Rodrigo
    Gonzalez-Perez, Abel
    Lopez-Bigas, Nuria
    [J]. GENOME MEDICINE, 2018, 10
  • [47] Application of next-generation sequencing to improve cancer management: A review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness
    Tan, O.
    Shrestha, R.
    Cunich, M.
    Schofield, D. J.
    [J]. CLINICAL GENETICS, 2018, 93 (03) : 533 - 544
  • [48] COSMIC: the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer
    Tate, John G.
    Bamford, Sally
    Jubb, Harry C.
    Sondka, Zbyslaw
    Beare, David M.
    Bindal, Nidhi
    Boutselakis, Harry
    Cole, Charlotte G.
    Creatore, Celestino
    Dawson, Elisabeth
    Fish, Peter
    Harsha, Bhavana
    Hathaway, Charlie
    Jupe, Steve C.
    Kok, Chai Yin
    Noble, Kate
    Ponting, Laura
    Ramshaw, Christopher C.
    Rye, Claire E.
    Speedy, Helen E.
    Stefancsik, Ray
    Thompson, Sam L.
    Wang, Shicai
    Ward, Sari
    Campbell, Peter J.
    Forbes, Simon A.
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2019, 47 (D1) : D941 - D947
  • [49] Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration
    Thorvaldsdottir, Helga
    Robinson, James T.
    Mesirov, Jill P.
    [J]. BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 14 (02) : 178 - 192
  • [50] Routine use of the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq™ Cancer Hotspot Panel for identification of clinically actionable somatic mutations
    Tsongalis, Gregory J.
    Peterson, Jason D.
    de Abreu, Francine B.
    Tunkey, Christopher D.
    Gallagher, Torrey L.
    Strausbaugh, Linda D.
    Wells, Wendy A.
    Amos, Christopher I.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 52 (05) : 707 - 714