Gaseous and Particulate Emissions from Diesel Engines at Idle and under Load: Comparison of Biodiesel Blend and Ultralow Sulfur Diesel Fuels

被引:38
作者
Chin, Jo-Yu [1 ]
Batterman, Stuart A. [1 ]
Northrop, William F. [2 ]
Bohac, Stanislav V. [3 ]
Assanis, Dennis N. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Mech Engn, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Mech Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] SUNY Stony Brook, Off Provost, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
HEAVY-DUTY DIESEL; THERMAL-DESORPTION; EXHAUST EMISSIONS; AIR; PERFORMANCE; EXPOSURE; VEHICLES; PARTICLE; SEMIVOLATILE; SPECIATION;
D O I
10.1021/ef300421h
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Diesel exhaust emissions have been reported for a number of engine operating strategies, after treatment technologies; and fuels; However, information is limited regarding emissions of many pollutants during idling and when biodiesel fuels are used This study investigates regulated and unregulated emissions from both light duty passenger car (1.7 L) and medium duty (6.4 L) diesel engines at idle and load and compares a biodiesel blend (B20) to conventional ultralow sulfur diesel (ULSD) fuel. Exhaust aftertreatment devices included a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) and a diesel particle filter (DPF). For the 1.7 L engine under load without a DOC, B20 reduced brake-specific emissions of particulate matter (PM), elemental carbon (EC), nonmethane hydrocarbons (NMHCs), and most volatile organic compounds (VOCs) compared to ULSD; however, formaldehyde brake-specific emissions increased. With a DOC and high load, B20 increased brake-specific emissions of NMHC, nitrogen oxides (NOx), formaldehyde, naphthalene, and Several other VOCs. For. the 64 L engine under load, B20 reduced brake specific emissions of PM2.5, BC, formaldehyde, and most VOCs; however, NOx brake specific emissions increased. When idling,:the effects of fuel type were different: B20 increased NMHC, PM2.5, EC, formaldehyde, benzene, and other VOC emission rates from both engines, and changes were sometimes large, e.g., PM2.5 increased by 60% for the 6.4 L/2004 calibration engine, and benzene by 40% for the L engine with the DOC, possibly reflecting incomplete combustion and unburned fuel. Diesel exhaust emissions depended on the fuel type and engine load (idle versus loaded):. The higher emissions found when using B20 are especially important given the recent attention to exposures from idling vehicles and the health significance of PM2.5. The emission profiles demonstrate the effects of fuel type, engine calibration, and emission,control system, and they can be used as source profiles for apportionment, inventory, and exposure purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:6737 / 6748
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000011968 SAE
[2]  
[Anonymous], COMPR AN BIOD IMP EX
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, SAE TECHNICAL PAPER
[4]   Speciation of the semivolatile hydrocarbon engine emissions from sunflower biodiesel [J].
Ballesteros, R. ;
Hernandez, J. J. ;
Lyons, L. L. ;
Cabanas, B. ;
Tapia, A. .
FUEL, 2008, 87 (10-11) :1835-1843
[5]   Low-flow active and passive sampling of VOCs using thermal desorption tubes: theory and application at an offset printing facility [J].
Batterman, S ;
Metts, T ;
Kalliokoski, P ;
Barnett, E .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2002, 4 (03) :361-370
[6]   School buses, diesel emissions, and respiratory health [J].
Beatty, Timothy K. M. ;
Shimshack, Jay P. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2011, 30 (05) :987-999
[7]   Oxidative Potential of Semi-Volatile and Non Volatile Particulate Matter (PM) from Heavy-Duty Vehicles Retrofitted with Emission Control Technologies [J].
Biswas, Subhasis ;
Verma, Vishal ;
Schauer, James J. ;
Cassee, Flemming R. ;
Cho, Arthur K. ;
Sioutas, Constantinos .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (10) :3905-3912
[8]  
Bohac S, 2006, 2006010201 SAE
[9]  
California Air Resources Board, HEAV DUT VEH IDL EM
[10]   Performance and exhaust emissions of a biodiesel engine [J].
Canakci, M ;
Erdil, A ;
Arcaklioglu, E .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2006, 83 (06) :594-605