Improving quality in Medicaid - The use of care management processes for chronic illness and preventive care

被引:24
|
作者
Rittenhouse, DR
Robinson, JC
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Family & Community Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Div Hlth Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.mlr.0000188992.48592.cd
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Care management processes (CMPs), tools to improve the efficiency and quality of primary care delivery, are particularly important for low-income patients facing substantial barriers to care. Objective: To measure the adoption of CMPs by medical groups, Independent Practice Associations, community clinics, and hospital-based clinics in California's Medicaid program and the factors associated with CMP adoption. Methods: Telephone survey of every provider organization with at least 6 primary care physicians and at least 1 Medi-Cal HMO contract, Spring 2003. One hundred twenty-three organizations participated, accounting for 64% of provider organizations serving Medicaid managed care in California. We surveyed 30 measures of CMP use for asthma and diabetes, and for child and adolescent preventive services. Results: The mean number of CMPs used by each organization was 4.5 for asthma and 4.9 for diabetes (of a possible 8). The mean number of CMPs for preventive services was 4.0 for children and 3.5 for adolescents (of a possible 7). Organizations with more extensive involvement in Medi-Cal managed care used more CMPs for chronic illness and preventive service. Community clinics and hospital-based clinics used more CMPs for asthma and diabetes than did Independent Practice Associations (IPAs), and profitable organizations used more CMPs for child and adolescent preventive services than did entities facing severe financial constraints. The use of CMPs by Medicaid HMOs and the presence of external (financial and nonfinancial) incentives for clinical performance were strongly associated with use of care management by provider organizations. Conclusions: Physician and provider organizations heavily involved in California's Medicaid program are extensively engaged in preventive and chronic care management programs.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 54
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hospital admissions and quality of chronic illness care
    White, PT
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 1997, 47 (424): : 750 - 750
  • [22] Condition based payment: improving care of chronic illness
    DiPiero, A
    Sanders, D
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7492): : 654 - 657
  • [23] Improving the management of care for high-cost medicaid patients
    Billings, John
    Mijanovich, Tod
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2007, 26 (06) : 1643 - 1655
  • [24] Improving chronic illness care: Translating evidence into action
    Wagner, EH
    Austin, BT
    Davis, C
    Hindmarsh, M
    Schaefer, J
    Bonomi, A
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2001, 20 (06) : 64 - 78
  • [25] IMPROVING THE CARE OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC MENTAL-ILLNESS
    MECHANIC, D
    AIKEN, LH
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 317 (26): : 1634 - 1638
  • [26] The pursuit of preventive care for chronic illness: turning healthy people into chronic patients
    Kreiner, Meta J.
    Hunt, Linda M.
    SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2014, 36 (06) : 870 - 884
  • [27] Impact of a decline in Colorado Medicaid managed care enrollment on access and quality of preventive primary care services
    Berman, S
    Armon, C
    Todd, J
    PEDIATRICS, 2005, 116 (06) : 1474 - 1479
  • [28] Use of severity of illness to evaluate quality of care
    MacKenzie, TA
    GreenawayCoates, A
    Djurfeldt, MS
    Hopman, WM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1996, 8 (02) : 125 - 130
  • [29] Individual care plans in chronic illness care: aims, use and outcomes
    Rijken, Mieke
    van der Heide, Iris
    Heijmans, Monique
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2016, 16
  • [30] Children's preventive care use under two mature Medicaid managed care plans in California
    Lo Sasso, AT
    Gavin, NI
    Freund, DA
    HEALTH CARE FINANCING REVIEW, 1998, 19 (04): : 69 - 83