Social responsibility and research ethics in community-driven studies of industrialized hog production

被引:65
作者
Wing, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
African Americans; agriculture; confidentiality; environmental justice; livestock; swine; water pollution;
D O I
10.1289/ehp.02110437
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental health research can document exposures and health effects that result from inequitable relationships between communities of low income or people of color and the institutions that derive benefits (profits, federal and state funding or services, avoidance of wastes) from activities and policies that burden these communities. Researchers, most of whom work in relatively privileged institutions, are placed in situations of conflicting loyalties if they conduct research in collaboration with, or on behalf of, communities burdened by environmental injustices. These conflicts can threaten die self-interest of researchers and may raise social and ethical issues that do not typically a-rise in research projects that respond to the agendas of institutions. This article describes how we addressed issues of research ethics and social responsibility in environmental health research on industrialized hog production in North Carolina. Researchers and institutional review boards are not well prepared to address ethical issues when interests of entire communities, as well as individual research participants, are involved. Community-driven research partnerships can help address problems in research ethics and can enhance the social responsibility of researchers and their institutions.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 444
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   RACE, CLASS, AND ENVIRONMENTAL-HEALTH - A REVIEW AND SYSTEMATIZATION OF THE LITERATURE [J].
BROWN, P .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 69 (01) :15-30
[2]  
Bullard R.D., 1994, Unequal protection, P3
[3]  
CECELSKI D, 1992, SO EXPOSURE, V20, P9
[4]   Concentrated swine feeding operations and public health: A review of occupational and community health effects [J].
Cole, D ;
Todd, L ;
Wing, S .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2000, 108 (08) :685-699
[6]   Environmental justice, swine production and farm loss in North Carolina [J].
Edwards, B ;
Ladd, AE .
SOCIOLOGICAL SPECTRUM, 2000, 20 (03) :263-290
[7]   Science and subpoenas: When do the courts become instruments of manipulation? [J].
Fischer, PM .
LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS, 1996, 59 (03) :159-167
[8]   Restructuring of hog farming in North Carolina: Explosion and implosion [J].
Furuseth, OJ .
PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 1997, 49 (04) :391-403
[9]   A LEGACY OF DISTRUST - AFRICAN-AMERICANS AND MEDICAL-RESEARCH [J].
GAMBLE, VN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1993, 9 (06) :35-38
[10]  
HERRING E, COMMUNICATION