Parallel discriminative subspace for city target detection from high dimension images

被引:1
作者
Zhang, Yipeng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yiming [3 ]
Du, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Xiaoyang [1 ,2 ]
Tu, Weiping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Natl Engn Res Ctr Multimedia Software, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Inst Artificial Intelligence, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Informat Engn Surveying Mapping & R, Wuhan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Target detection; Remote sensing; Parallel computing; FPGA; SPARSE REPRESENTATION; ANOMALY DETECTION; OBJECT DETECTION; PROJECTION; CLASSIFICATION; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1007/s10707-020-00399-7
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
City Target Detection is an enduring problem that intrigues the researchers all over the world. The great success of existing Target Detection algorithm appears in ubiquitous scenarios: Pedestrian Detection, Vehicle Tracking, etc. However, as for the city target detection in the remote sensing, we are facing with two inevitable problems: Complex Environment and Massive Information. The complicated environment encumbers the accurate extraction of the target profile, and the huge amount of information turns it into a heavy workload to get the final outcome for the conventional CPU- compiler architecture. In this paper, we propose a binary hypothesis framework based on adaptive dictionary and discriminative subspace for hyperspectral city target detection (BHADDS). Furthermore, we have also implemented it on other hardware platform alongside with CPU, such as FPGA. FPGA is a low-power portable and programmble SoC, and also the protocol model for potential massive production of the SoC chipset. Our eventual aim is heading for the high-performance processor with strong instant processing ability for remote sensing. In the final part of the paper, we have given a comprehensive performance comparison over the different platforms and summarized their applicable scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 322
页数:24
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] An L, 2018, GEOINFORMATICA, V22, P1
  • [2] Orthogonal subspace projection (OSP) revisited: A comprehensive study and analysis
    Chang, CI
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2005, 43 (03): : 502 - 518
  • [3] Generalized constrained energy minimization approach to subpixel target detection for multispectral imagery
    Chang, CI
    Liu, JM
    Chieu, BC
    Ren, H
    Wang, CM
    Lo, CS
    Chung, PC
    Yang, CW
    Ma, DJ
    [J]. OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 39 (05) : 1275 - 1281
  • [4] Linear spectral random mixture analysis for hyperspectral imagery
    Chang, CI
    Chiang, SS
    Smith, JA
    Ginsberg, IW
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2002, 40 (02): : 375 - 392
  • [5] Sparse Representation for Target Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery
    Chen, Yi
    Nasrabadi, Nasser M.
    Tran, Trac D.
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2011, 5 (03) : 629 - 640
  • [6] Simultaneous Joint Sparsity Model for Target Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery
    Chen, Yi
    Nasrabadi, Nasser M.
    Tran, Trac D.
    [J]. IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2011, 8 (04) : 676 - 680
  • [7] A survey on object detection in optical remote sensing images
    Cheng, Gong
    Han, Junwei
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 117 : 11 - 28
  • [8] Dimensionality Reduction and Classification of Hyperspectral Images Using Ensemble Discriminative Local Metric Learning
    Dong, Yanni
    Du, Bo
    Zhang, Liangpei
    Zhang, Lefei
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 55 (05): : 2509 - 2524
  • [9] Beyond the Sparsity-Based Target Detector: A Hybrid Sparsity and Statistics-Based Detector for Hyperspectral Images
    Du, Bo
    Zhang, Yuxiang
    Zhang, Liangpei
    Tao, Dacheng
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2016, 25 (11) : 5345 - 5357
  • [10] Random-Selection-Based Anomaly Detector for Hyperspectral Imagery
    Du, Bo
    Zhang, Liangpei
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 49 (05): : 1578 - 1589