Which muscle relaxants should be used in day surgery and when

被引:29
作者
Bettelli, Gabriella [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Policlin Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Modena, Italy
关键词
ambulatory anaesthesia; ambulatory surgery; myalgia; neuromuscular blocking agents; postoperative residual curarization; sugammadex;
D O I
10.1097/ACO.0b013e32801062eb
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose of review After myorelaxants, myalgia and residual curarization may complicate recovery. Local anaesthesia and minimally invasive airway management make myorelaxants disputable in many outpatient procedures; nevertheless, neuromuscular blockade may be necessary to facilitate intubation or maintain muscle relaxation. Agent selection criteria are discussed. Recent findings Reduced hospital time is not associated with central neuraxial or peripheral nerve block. To reduce the risk for residual block, neuromuscular monitoring is mandatory. Use of reversal agents should not be restricted, although studies have shown higher incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting following their use. Higher succinylcholine dosage is followed by lower incidence of myalgia. The relationship between fasciculation and myalgia is unclear. Sodium channel blockers or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs may prevent myalgia. Sugammadex functions as a chelating agent. Summary Ear-nose-throat, open eye surgery and laparoscopy may demand myoresolution. Regional and minimally invasive anaesthesia are alternative solutions. Central and peripheral nerve blocks are associated with increased induction time, reduced pain scores, and decreased need for analgesics. Central neuraxial block, however, is associated with prolonged outpatient unit stay. Bad intubating conditions may cause pharyngo-laryngeal complications: the decision to avoid myorelaxants for tracheal intubation appears illogical. Incidence of postoperative residual curarization remains very high. Sugammadex offers new perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 605
页数:6
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2004, ACTA ANAESTH BELG, V55, P245
  • [2] Residual curarization in the recovery room after vecuronium
    Baillard, C
    Gehan, G
    Reboul-Marty, J
    Larmignat, P
    Samama, CM
    Cupa, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 84 (03) : 394 - 395
  • [3] Low-dose rocuronium improves conditions for tracheal intubation after Induction of anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil
    Barclay, K
    Eggers, K
    Asai, T
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 78 (01) : 92 - 94
  • [4] Basta SJ, 1997, AMBULATORY ANESTHESI, P394
  • [5] Residual neuromuscular blockade
    Beaussier, M
    Boughaba, MA
    [J]. ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 2005, 24 (10): : 1266 - 1274
  • [6] Residual neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications - A prospective, randomised, and blinded study of postoperative pulmonary complications after atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium
    Berg, H
    VibyMogensen, J
    Roed, J
    Mortensen, CR
    Engbaek, J
    Skovgaard, LT
    Krintel, JJ
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 41 (09) : 1095 - 1103
  • [7] Bevan DR, 1986, NEUROMUSCULAR TRANSM, P84
  • [8] Early and late reversal of rocuronium and vecuronium with neostigmine in adults and children
    Bevan, JC
    Collins, L
    Fowler, C
    Kahwaji, R
    Rosen, HD
    Smith, MF
    Scheepers, LD
    Stephenson, CA
    Bevan, DR
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 89 (02) : 333 - 339
  • [9] HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE TO INDUCTION AND INTUBATION
    BILLARD, V
    MOULLA, F
    BOURGAIN, JL
    MEGNIGBETO, A
    STANSKI, DR
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (06) : 1384 - 1393
  • [10] Bornowski RG, 2006, CLEV CLIN J MED S1, V73, P57