The Co-production of Science, Ethics, and Emotion

被引:60
|
作者
Pickersgill, Martyn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Med, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
academic disciplines and traditions; ethics; labor; emotion; power; governance; law; WORK; NEUROSCIENCE; BIOETHICS; ECONOMY; ISSUES; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1177/0162243911433057
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
The concept of "ethical research" holds considerable sway over the ways in which contemporary biomedical, natural, and social science investigations are funded, regulated, and practiced within a variety of countries. Some commentators have viewed this "new" means of governance positively; others, however, have been resoundingly critical, regarding it as restrictive and ethics bodies and regulations unfit for the task they have been set (or have set themselves). Regardless, it is clear that science today is an "ethical" business. The ways in which formal and informal ethical discourses and practices-what might be called "regimes of normativity"a"structure scientific work and the meanings it is ascribed with have, however, been underexplored. This article attends to how science and ethics articulate; how they are, in many ways, co-produced. Exploring these processes of co-production casts into sharp relief the essential emotionality of science; the relationships investigators have with their colleagues, work, and research participants pulse with emotion, potentially shaping in important ways the very kinds of knowledge that laboratories produce.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 603
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Living labs and co-production: university campuses as platforms for sustainability science
    Evans, James
    Jones, Ross
    Karvonen, Andrew
    Millard, Lucy
    Wendler, Jana
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 16 : 1 - 6
  • [32] Co-production of an institution: Montserrat Volcano Observatory and social dependence on science
    Donovan, Amy R.
    Bravo, Michael
    Oppenheimer, Clive
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2013, 40 (02) : 171 - 186
  • [33] (CO)CONTAMINATION AS THE DARK SIDE OF CO-PRODUCTION Public value failures in co-production processes
    Williams, Brian N.
    Kang, Seong-Cheol
    Johnson, Japera
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2016, 18 (05) : 692 - 717
  • [34] Science, ethics and emotion in the politics of biodiversity
    Hay, Pete
    BIODIVERSITY: INTEGRATING CONSERVATION AND PRODUCTION, 2008, : 3 - 12
  • [35] Reflections on Making Co-production Work: The Reality of Co-production from an Insider Perspective
    Fillingham, Joy
    Smith, Julia
    Sealey, Clive
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2023, 53 (03): : 1593 - 1601
  • [36] Balancing Power and Co-production Comment on "Research Co-production: An Underused Pathway to Impact"
    Cameron, Jacqui
    Fiolet, Renee
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 13
  • [37] Local economics and co-production
    Boyle D.
    Development, 2010, 53 (3) : 319 - 324
  • [39] New science for global sustainability? The institutionalisation of knowledge co-production in Future Earth
    van der Hel, Sandra
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2016, 61 : 165 - 175
  • [40] The 'co' in co-production of climate action: Challenging boundaries within and between science, policy and practice
    Howarth, C.
    Lane, M.
    Morse-Jones, S.
    Brooks, K.
    Viner, D.
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2022, 72