Geotechnical techniques for the construction of reactive barriers

被引:57
作者
Day, SR
O'Hannesin, SF
Marsden, L
机构
[1] Geo Solutions, Littleton, CO 80120 USA
[2] EnivorMet Inc, Waterloo, ON N2V 2G6, Canada
[3] Rantec Corp, Ranchester, WY 82839 USA
关键词
permeable reactive barrier; biopolymer; guar gum; slurry wall; granular iron; grouting; deep soil mixing;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00044-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
One of the newest and most promising remediation techniques for the treatment of contaminated groundwater and soil is the reactive barrier wall (commonly known as PRE for permeable reactive barrier or reactive barrier). Although a variety of treatment media and strategies are available, the most common technique is to bury granular iron in a trench so that contaminated groundwater passes through the reactive materials, the contaminants are removed and the water becomes 'clean'. The principal advantages of the technique are the elimination of pumping, mass excavation, off-site disposal, and a very significant reduction in costs. The use of this technology is now becoming better known and implemented. Special construction considerations need to be made when planning the installation of reactive barriers or PRBs to ensure the design life of the installation and to be cost-effective. Geotechnical techniques such as slurry trenching, deep soil mixing, and grouting can be used to simplify and improve the installation of reactive materials relative to conventional trench and fill methods. These techniques make it possible to reduce the hazards to workers during installation, reduce waste and reduce costs for most installations. To date, most PRBs have been installed to shallow depths using construction methods such as open trenching and/or shored excavations. While these methods are usable, they are limited to shallow depths and more disruptive to the site's normal use. Geotechnical techniques are more quickly installed and less disruptive to site activities and thus more effective. Recently, laboratory studies and pilot projects have demonstrated that geotechnical techniques can be used successfully to install reactive barriers. This paper describes the factors that are important in designing a reactive barrier or PRB installation and discusses some of the potential problems and pitfalls that can be avoided with careful planning and the use of geotechnical techniques. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 297
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   A full-scale porous reactive wall for prevention of acid mine drainage [J].
Benner, SG ;
Blowes, DW ;
Ptacek, CJ .
GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 1997, 17 (04) :99-107
[2]  
BENNETT TA, 1997, THESIS U WATERLOO WA
[3]  
BERRYSPARK MD, 1998, 1 INT C REM CHLOR RE
[4]  
CLARK DK, 1996, REMEDIATION MANAGEME
[5]  
Day SR, 1998, FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REMEDIATION OF CHLORINATED AND RECALCITRANT COMPOUNDS, VOL 5, P19
[6]  
GAVASKAR AR, 1997, PERMEABLE BARRIERS G
[7]   ENHANCED DEGRADATION OF HALOGENATED ALIPHATICS BY ZERO-VALENT IRON [J].
GILLHAM, RW ;
OHANNESIN, SF .
GROUND WATER, 1994, 32 (06) :958-967
[8]  
GILLHAM RW, 1992, IAH C MOD TRENDS HYD, P94
[9]  
GILLHAM RW, 1997, RECENT DEV PERMEABLE, P343
[10]  
GU B, 1998, RTDF PREM REACT BARR, P85