Adult vaccination uptake strategies in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

被引:15
作者
Perroud, Janamarie M. [1 ]
Soldano, Shad [2 ]
Avancena, Anton L. V. [1 ]
Wagner, Abram [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, 1415 Washington Hts,SPH2, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, 1415 Washington Hts, SPH 2, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 1415 Washington Hts, SPH 2, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Global health; Immunization programs; Literature review; Vaccine intent; Vaccine hesitancy; Vaccine uptake; HEALTH-CARE WORKERS; SEX WORKERS; HESITANCY; KNOWLEDGE; TRANSMISSION; IMMUNIZATION; PREVENTION; BRAZIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.07.054
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Evidence-based strategies can maximize vaccination intent and uptake among adults. This systematic review summarizes the existing literature on strategies to improve vaccination intent and uptake among adults in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) to inform future implementation in various populations and contexts. Methods: Eligible studies were identified through a systematic search in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Libraries, as well as grey literature databases published between January 2010 and March 2021. The search was limited to studies in LMICs that evaluated adult vaccination interventions. Data were extracted from the included studies and evaluated against the World Health Organization's Behavioral and Social Drivers of Vaccination Framework. The National Institutes of Health study quality assessment tools were used to evaluate study quality.Results: The initial literature review identified 2,854 records, 22 of which met the inclusion criteria. The majority (n = 19 or 86%) of studies were from middle-income countries, with the remaining studies (n = 3 or 13%) set in low-income countries. The majority (15/22, 68%) of interventions were multi-component. 82% (18/22) of studies addressed thoughts and feelings, 59% (13/22) addressed social processes, and 73% (16/22) addressed practical issues. Five studies reported primary outcomes of vaccination intent, and the remaining 17 reported vaccine uptake. 36% (8/22) of the studies cited statistically significant positive intervention effects on vaccination intent or uptake. Few of the included studies (6/22, 27%) were RTCs, and most studies (15/22, 68%) were of poor study quality. The studies reporting the highest increase in vaccination intent and uptake were multi-component interventions that addressed all three determi-nants of vaccination.Discussion: The results of this review highlight levers that can be used to encourage vaccine intent and uptake in the ongoing rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, as well as the deployment of other vaccines to adult populations in LMICs. Of the included studies, multicomponent interventions were most effective, mainly when targeting multiple determinants of vaccination. However, poor study quality indicates the need for additional research to validate these findings.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:5313 / 5321
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[21]   Health-Care Workers' Perspectives on Ebola Virus Vaccine: A Focus Group and In-Depth Interview Interventional Study [J].
Esangbedo, Dorothy O. ;
Ughasoro, Maduka D. ;
Tagbo, Beckie N. ;
Olowu, Adebiyi ;
Anikene, Chukwuemeka ;
Iwegbulam, Chimaobi C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2016, 95 (03) :654-662
[22]   Immunization of pregnant women: Future of early infant protection [J].
Faucette, Azure N. ;
Pawlitz, Michael D. ;
Pei, Bo ;
Yao, Fayi ;
Chen, Kang .
HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2015, 11 (11) :2549-2555
[23]  
Gavi the Vaccine Alliance [Gavi], 2020, COVID 19 SIT REP
[24]   Preferential differences in vaccination decision-making for oneself or one's child in The Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment [J].
Hoogink, Joram ;
Verelst, Frederik ;
Kessels, Roselinde ;
van Hoek, Albert Jan ;
Timen, Aura ;
Willem, Lander ;
Beutels, Philippe ;
Wallinga, Jacco ;
de Wit, G. Ardine .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
[25]   Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour [J].
Isler, Ozan ;
Isler, Burcu ;
Kopsacheilis, Orestis ;
Ferguson, Eamonn .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
[26]   Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy - A systematic review [J].
Jarrett, Caitlin ;
Wilson, Rose ;
O'Leary, Maureen ;
Eckersberger, Elisabeth ;
Larson, Heidi J. .
VACCINE, 2015, 33 (34) :4180-4190
[27]   Impacts of free vaccination policy and associated factors on influenza vaccination behavior of the elderly in China: A quasi-experimental study [J].
Jiang, Xuewen ;
Shang, Xiaopeng ;
Lin, Junfen ;
Zhao, Yanrong ;
Wang, Wei ;
Qiu, Yinwei .
VACCINE, 2021, 39 (05) :846-852
[28]   'My primary purpose is to protect the unborn child': Understanding pregnant women's perceptions of maternal vaccination and vaccine trials in Europe [J].
Karafillakis, E. ;
Paterson, P. ;
Larson, H. J. .
VACCINE, 2021, 39 (39) :5673-5679
[29]   Measuring vaccine hesitancy: The development of a survey tool [J].
Larson, Heidi J. ;
Jarrett, Caitlin ;
Schulz, William S. ;
Chaudhuri, Mohuya ;
Zhou, Yuqing ;
Dube, Eve ;
Schuster, Melanie ;
MacDonald, Noni E. ;
Wilson, Rose .
VACCINE, 2015, 33 (34) :4165-4175
[30]   Feasibility of a combined strategy of HPV vaccination and screening in Mexico: the FASTER-Tlalpan study experience [J].
Leon-Maldonado, L. ;
Cabral, A. ;
Brown, B. ;
Ryan, G. W. ;
Maldonado, A. ;
Salmeron, J. ;
Allen-Leigh, B. ;
Lazcano-Ponce, E. ;
Leon, Leith ;
Torres, Leticia ;
Hernandez, Rubi ;
Rivera, Berenice ;
Ramirez, Paula ;
Bosch, Xavier ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Lorincz, Attila ;
Wheeler, Cosette M. ;
Castle, Philip E. ;
Lazcano, Eduardo ;
Huerta, Eira ;
Gonzalez, Citlali ;
Ocampo, Dayan ;
Hernandez, Pilar ;
Meneses, Joacim ;
Mendiola, Indira ;
Salmeron, Jorge .
HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2019, 15 (7-8) :1986-1994