Rapid sequence induction: a national survey of practice

被引:122
作者
Morris, J [1 ]
Cook, TM [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal United Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Bath BA1 3NG, Avon, England
关键词
anaesthesia; rapid sequence induction; cricoid pressure; intubation; tracheal; difficult; failed;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01962.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We performed a national postal survey exploring anaesthetists' practice in rapid sequence induction. All respondents used pre-oxygenation, although the technique employed, and its reliability, varied. Thiopental and succinylcholine, given after waiting for signs of loss of consciousness, were the most widely used drugs for rapid sequence induction. Propofol and rocuronium were used by more than a third of respondents, and most respondents (75%) also routinely administered an opioid. Cricoid pressure was used universally but the practice of its application varied widely. The commonest aids used if intubation was difficult were the gum elastic bougie, the long laryngoscope blade and the laryngeal mask. After failed intubation, approximately half of respondents would maintain the supine position. Failure to intubate at rapid sequence intubation had been seen by 45% of respondents but harm was uncommon. In contrast, 28% had seen regurgitation, which frequently led to considerable harm and to three deaths. In spite of this, practice of a failed intubation drill was uncommon (15%) and anaesthetic assistants were rarely known to practice application of cricoid pressure. Consultants were less likely than trainees to use rocuronium. as a muscle relaxant, and more likely to choose morphine if administering an opioid. They were less likely to practice a failed intubation drill. Other aspects of practice varied little between grades. This survey suggests that many anaesthetists do not follow best practice when performing a rapid sequence induction.
引用
收藏
页码:1090 / 1097
页数:8
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
ABOUMADI MN, 1977, CAN ANAESTH SOC J, V24, P12
[2]  
Adams AP, 1986, EMERGENCY ANAESTHESI, P1
[3]  
AITKENHEAD AR, 1996, TXB ANAESTHESIA, P523
[4]   PREOPERATIVE BETA-BLOCKADE FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING CRANIOTOMY - A COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPRANOLOL AND ATENOLOL [J].
ALLBERRY, RAW ;
DRAKE, HF .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1990, 37 (04) :448-451
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, LANCET, V339, P31
[6]   CRICOID PRESSURE IMPEDES PLACEMENT OF THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY [J].
ASAI, T ;
BARCLAY, K ;
POWER, I ;
VAUGHAN, RS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 74 (05) :521-525
[7]   Use of a mechanical simulator for training in applying cricoid pressure [J].
Ashurst, N ;
Rout, CC ;
Rocke, BA ;
Gouws, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 77 (04) :468-472
[8]   Failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics: a 6-year review in a UK region [J].
Barnardo, PD ;
Jenkins, JG .
ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 55 (07) :690-694
[9]  
Baskett PJF, 1996, RESUSCITATION, V31, P201, DOI 10.1016/0300-9572(96)00976-8
[10]   COMPARISON OF INTUBATION FOLLOWING PROPOFOL AND ALFENTANIL WITH INTUBATION FOLLOWING THIOPENTONE AND SUXAMETHONIUM [J].
BECK, GN ;
MASTERSON, GR ;
RICHARDS, J ;
BUNTING, P .
ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 48 (10) :876-880