Effect of two different primers on the shear bond strength of metallic brackets to zirconia ceramic

被引:14
作者
Franz, Alexander [1 ]
Raabe, Modesto
Lilaj, Bledar [1 ]
Dauti, Rinet [1 ]
Moritz, Andreas [1 ]
Muessig, Dieter [3 ]
Cvikl, Barbara [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Conservat Dent & Periodontol, Sensengasse 2A, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Sigmund Freud Univ, Dept Conservat Dent, Vienna, Austria
[3] Danube Private Univ, Div Dent, Ctr Orthodont, Krems, Austria
关键词
HYDROFLUORIC-ACID; SURFACE; PORCELAIN; ROUGHNESS;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-019-0740-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: In view of the increasing demand of adult orthodontics for esthetic purposes, adult treatment with brackets has become an important issue. One essential factor for the quality of such treatment is bracket bonding on ceramics. For testing the adhesive bond between the bracket and the ceramic surface it is important to consider the static or cyclic loading that goes along with it. Methods: Metallic Brackets were adhesively fixed on zirconia ceramic blocks in a simulated leveling phase using two different primers (Monobond S and Monobond Etch & Prime). Half of the metallic brackets were activated using a 0.14-nickel titanium wire, while the other half remained non-activated. Shear bond testing (SBT) was performed after thermocycling. Furthermore the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was analyzed. Results: SBT resulted in significantly higher shear bond values when Monobond Etch & Prime was used compared to the use of Monobond S. Activation of the brackets did not show different results in comparison to the non-activated brackets. The ARI did not indicate cement remnants on the ceramic surface, regardless of the primer and the activation status. Conclusions: The use of Monobond Etch & Prime has great potential for the bonding of brackets on dental zirconia ceramics.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces [J].
Abu Alhaija, Elham S. J. ;
Abu AlReesh, Issam A. ;
AlWahadni, Ahed M. S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2010, 32 (03) :274-280
[2]  
Ajlouni R, 2005, ANGLE ORTHOD, V75, P858
[3]   Porcelain surface treatment by laser for bracket-porcelain bonding [J].
Akova, T ;
Yoldas, O ;
Toroglu, MS ;
Uysal, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2005, 128 (05) :630-637
[4]   In vitro orthodontic bracket bonding to porcelain [J].
Al-Hity, R. ;
Gustin, M.-P. ;
Bridel, N. ;
Morgon, L. ;
Grosgogeat, B. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2012, 34 (04) :505-511
[5]   CLINICAL-TRIALS WITH CRYSTAL-GROWTH CONDITIONING AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO ACID-ETCH ENAMEL PRETREATMENT [J].
ARTUN, J ;
BERGLAND, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1984, 85 (04) :333-340
[6]   The effect of early static loading on the in vitro shear/peel bond strength of a 'no-mix' orthodontic adhesive [J].
Ching, E ;
Cook, PA ;
Bubb, NL ;
Wood, DJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2000, 22 (05) :555-559
[7]  
Dönmez MB, 2018, AM J DENT, V31, P249
[8]  
Dumbryte I, 2018, EUR J ORTHOD
[9]   Self-etching ceramic primer versus hydrofluoric acid etching: Etching efficacy and bonding performance [J].
El-Damanhoury, Hatem M. ;
Gaintantzopoulou, Maria D. .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2018, 62 (01) :75-83
[10]   Influence of surface conditioning on ceramic microstructure and bracket adhesion [J].
Falkensammer, Frank ;
Freudenthaler, Josef ;
Pseiner, Bernhard ;
Bantleon, Hans Peter .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2012, 34 (04) :498-504