Metabolic Discrimination of Breast Cancer Subtypes at the Single-Cell Level by Multiple Microextraction Coupled with Mass Spectrometry

被引:50
|
作者
Wang, Ruihua [1 ]
Zhao, Hansen [2 ]
Zhang, Xiaochao [2 ]
Zhao, Xu [2 ]
Song, Zhe [2 ]
Ouyang, Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Chem, Minist Educ, Key Lab Theoret & Computat Photochem, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Chem, Beijing Key Lab Microanalyt Methods & Instrumenta, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS; PRIMARY THERAPY; O-GLCNAC; IONIZATION; MS; HIGHLIGHTS; PROFILES; PROBE; DIFFERENTIATION; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05739
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Discrimination of cancer subtypes at the single cell level is critical for the early diagnosis and accurate treatment of cancer. However, the discrimination of breast cancer subtypes based on their metabolite information, which could provide a new perspective of the cellular metabolomics, is still in its infancy. Herein, a high-coverage single cell metabolic analysis was carried out for the discrimination of breast cancer subtypes by combining multiple microextraction with mass spectrometry (MS). About 4300 ion signals were extracted from each cell and assigned to lipids, energy metabolites, and so on. Based on the multivariate analysis of the metabolite information, four subtypes of breast cancer were successfully discriminated. Characteristic components of each subtype were also identified as potential biomarkers such as phosphatidylcholine (PC; PC (32:1), PC (34:1)), UDP/UDP-exNAc, and Hex-bis-P/Hex-P). Moreover, metabolomics correlation analysis at the single-cell level further revealed the coregulation clusters of the identified components, which provided more metabolites data for bioinformatics studies. Overall, our results on single cell metabolic analysis could give new insights to precision medicine, early diagnosis, and cancer treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:3667 / 3674
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mannose Promotes Metabolic Discrimination Osteosarcoma Cells at Single-Cell Level by Mass Spectrometry
    Fang, Zhuyin
    Wang, Ruihua
    Zhao, Hansen
    Yao, Huan
    Ouyang, Jin
    Zhang, Xinrong
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 92 (03) : 2690 - 2696
  • [2] Single-Cell Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Multiple Drugs and Nanomaterials at Organelle Level
    Meng, Yifan
    Gao, Chaohong
    Lu, Qiao
    Ma, Siyuan
    Hang, Wei
    ACS NANO, 2021, 15 (08) : 13220 - 13229
  • [3] Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry - Single-cell Analysis
    Pluhacek, Tomas
    Maier, Vitezslav
    CHEMICKE LISTY, 2020, 114 (03): : 239 - 243
  • [4] Single-cell mass spectrometry
    Tajik, Mohammad
    Baharfar, Mahroo
    Donald, William A.
    TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 40 (11) : 1374 - 1392
  • [5] Quantitative Extraction and Mass Spectrometry Analysis at a Single-Cell Level
    Yin, Ruichuan
    Prabhakaran, Venkateshkumar
    Laskin, Julia
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2018, 90 (13) : 7937 - 7945
  • [6] 'On the Spot' Digital Pathology of Breast Cancer Based on Single-Cell Mass Spectrometry Imaging
    Cuypers, Eva
    Claes, Britt S. R.
    Biemans, Rianne
    Lieuwes, Natasja G.
    Glunde, Kristine
    Dubois, Ludwig
    Heeren, Ron M. A.
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 94 (16) : 6180 - 6190
  • [7] Study on the Mechanism of Tamoxifen against Breast Cancer by Mass Spectrometry Based Single-Cell Metabolomics
    Qiu, Xiao-Dan
    Zhang, Yi
    Bai, Yu
    Journal of Chinese Mass Spectrometry Society, 2024, 45 (06) : 785 - 792
  • [8] Classifying Hypoxia in Breast Cancer Xenografts Using a Single-Cell Mass Spectrometry Imaging Model
    Claes, Britt S. R.
    Biemans, Rianne
    Lieuwes, Natasja
    Theunissen, Lynn
    Glunde, Kristine
    Dubois, Ludwig
    Heeren, Ron M. A.
    Cuypers, Eva
    ANALYSIS & SENSING, 2025,
  • [9] Live Single-cell Mass Spectrometry
    Tsutomu Masujima
    Analytical Sciences, 2009, 25 : 953 - 960
  • [10] Single-cell imaging mass spectrometry
    Passarelli, Melissa K.
    Ewing, Andrew G.
    CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2013, 17 (05) : 854 - 859