Preoperative mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation to reduce infectious complications of colorectal surgery - the need for updated guidelines

被引:18
作者
Battersby, C. L. F. [1 ,2 ]
Battersby, N. J. [3 ]
Slade, D. A. J. [2 ]
Soop, M. [2 ]
Walsh, C. J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Wrexham Maelor Hosp, Wrexham, Wales
[2] Salford Royal Fdn Trust, Salford, Lancs, England
[3] Wessex Sch Surg, Winchester, Hants, England
[4] Wirral Univ Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Wirral, Merseyside, England
关键词
Bowel preparation; Complications; Surgical site infection; SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; ENHANCED RECOVERY; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; COMBINATION; AMERICAN; COLON;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhin.2018.12.010
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Increasing evidence indicates that combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation reduces the infectious complications of colorectal surgery. Anecdotal evidence suggests the combination is rarely used in the UK and Europe. Aim: To establish colorectal surgeons' current use and awareness of the benefits of such bowel preparation, and to identify decision-making influences surrounding preoperative bowel preparation. Method: An electronic survey was emailed to all members of the Association of Colo-proctology of Great Britain and Ireland, and promoted via Twitter. Findings: A total of 495 respondents completed the survey: 413 (83.2%) UK, 39 (7.9%) other European, 43 (8.7%) non-European. Respondents used oral antibiotics for 12-20% of cases. Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), phosphate enema, and no preparation, respectively, ranged between 9 and 80%. Combined MBP and oral antibiotic bowel preparation ranged between 5.5 and 18.6%. Fifty-three percent (260/495) agreed that combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation reduces surgical site infection; 32% (157/495) agreed that the combination reduces risk of anastomotic leak. Kappa statistics between 0.06 and 0.27 indicate considerable incongruity between surgeons' awareness of the literature, and day-to-day practice. Twenty-four percent (96/495) believed MBP to be incompatible with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS); 41% (204/495) believed that MBP delays return to normal intestinal function. Conclusions: Few UK and European colorectal surgeons use mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation, despite evidence of its efficacy in reducing infectious complications. The influence of ERAS pathways and UK and European guidelines may explain this. In contradiction to the UK and Europe, North American guidelines recommend incorporating combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation into ERAS programmes. This study suggests that future UK and European guidelines incorporate combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation into the ERAS pathway. (C) 2018 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 299
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Abercrombie J, 2017, General Surgery: GIRFT Programme National Specialty Report
  • [2] Altman D. G., 1990, Practical Statistics for Medical Research
  • [3] Infectious Postoperative Complications Decrease Long-term Survival in Patients Undergoing Curative Surgery for Colorectal Cancer A Study of 12,075 Patients
    Artinyan, Avo
    Orcutt, Sonia T.
    Anaya, Daniel A.
    Richardson, Peter
    Chen, G. John
    Berger, David H.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 261 (03) : 497 - 505
  • [4] Preoperative Oral Antibiotics Reduce Surgical Site Infection Following Elective Colorectal Resections
    Cannon, Jamie A.
    Altom, Laura K.
    Deierhoi, Rhiannon J.
    Morris, Melanie
    Richman, Joshua S.
    Vick, Catherine C.
    Itani, Kamal M. F.
    Hawn, Mary T.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2012, 55 (11) : 1160 - 1166
  • [5] Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colon and Rectal Surgery From the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons
    Carmichael, Joseph C.
    Keller, Deborah S.
    Baldini, Gabriele
    Bordeianou, Liliana
    Weiss, Eric
    Lee, Lawrence
    Boutros, Marylise
    McClane, James
    Feldman, Liane S.
    Steele, Scott R.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (08) : 761 - 784
  • [6] A European survey of bowel preparation in colorectal surgery
    Devane, L. A.
    Proud, D.
    O'Connell, P. R.
    Panis, Y.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 19 (11) : O402 - O406
  • [7] Is There a Role for Oral Antibiotic Preparation Alone Before Colorectal Surgery? ACS-NSQIP Analysis by Coarsened Exact Matching
    Garfinkle, Richard
    Abou-Khalil, Jad
    Morin, Nancy
    Ghitulescu, Gabriela
    Vasilevsky, Carol-Ann
    Gordon, Philip
    Demian, Marie
    Boutros, Marylise
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (07) : 729 - 737
  • [8] Association of mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics and anastomotic leak following left sided colorectal resection: an international, multi-centre, prospective audit
    Glasbey, James C.
    Blanco-Colino, Ruth
    Kelly, Michael
    Singh, Baljit
    Nepogodiev, Dmitri
    Bhangu, Aneel
    Pinkney, Thomas
    Poskus, Tomas
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 20 : 15 - 32
  • [9] An Effective Bundled Approach Reduces Surgical Site Infections in a High-Outlier Colorectal Unit
    Gorgun, Emre
    Rencuzogullari, Ahmet
    Ozben, Volkan
    Stocchi, Luca
    Fraser, Thomas
    Benlice, Cigdem
    Hull, Tracy
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2018, 61 (01) : 89 - 98
  • [10] Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery
    Gueenaga, Katia F.
    Matos, Delcio
    Wille-Jorgensen, Peer
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (09):