Benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: An evidence update for the US preventive services task force

被引:206
作者
Lin, Kenneth [1 ]
Lipsitz, Robert [1 ]
Miller, Therese [1 ]
Janakiraman, Supriya [1 ]
机构
[1] Agcy Healthcare Res & Qual, Ctr Primary Care Prevent & Clin Partnerships, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Prostate cancer is the most common nonskin cancer in men in the United States, and prostate cancer screening has increased in recent years. In 2002, the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force concluded that evidence was insufficient to recommend for or against screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Purpose: To examine new evidence on benefits and harms of screening asymptomatic men for prostate cancer with PSA. Data Sources: English-language articles identified in PubMed and the Cochrane Library (search dates, January 2002 to July 2007), reference lists of retrieved articles, and expert suggestions. Study Selection: Randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses of PSA screening and cross-sectional and cohort studies of screening harms and of the natural history of screening-detected cancer were selected to answer the following questions: Does screening for prostate cancer with PSA, as a single-threshold test or as a function of multiple tests over time, decrease morbidity or mortality? What are the magnitude and nature of harms associated with prostate cancer screening, other than overtreatment? What is the natural history of PSA-detected, nonpalpable, localized prostate cancer? Data Extraction: Studies were reviewed, abstracted, and rated for quality by using predefined U. S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria. Data Synthesis: No good-quality randomized, controlled trials of screening for prostate cancer have been completed. In 1 cross-sectional and 2 prospective cohort studies of fair to good quality, false-positive PSA screening results caused psychological adverse effects for up to 1 year after the test. The natural history of PSA-detected prostate cancer is poorly understood. Limitations: Few eligible studies were identified. Long-term adverse effects of false-positive PSA screening test results are unknown. Conclusion: Prostate-specific antigen screening is associated with psychological harms, and its potential benefits remain uncertain.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 199
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Prostate cancer mortality in relation to screening by prostate-specific antigen testing and digital rectal examination: a population-based study in middle-aged men [J].
Agalliu, Ilir ;
Weiss, Noel S. ;
Lin, Daniel W. ;
Stanford, Janet L. .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2007, 18 (09) :931-937
[2]   20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Albertsen, PC ;
Hanley, JA ;
Fine, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (17) :2095-2101
[3]   Individualized screening interval for prostate cancer based on prostate-specific antigen level - Results of a prospective, randomized, population-based study [J].
Aus, G ;
Damber, JE ;
Khatami, A ;
Lilja, H ;
Stranne, J ;
Hugosson, J .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (16) :1857-1861
[4]   Prostate cancer screening decreases the absolute risk of being diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer - Results from a prospective, population-based randomized controlled trial [J].
Aus, Gunnar ;
Bergdahl, Suante ;
Lodding, Par ;
Liija, Hans ;
Hugosson, Jonas .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (03) :659-664
[5]   Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer [J].
Bill-Axelson, A ;
Holmberg, L ;
Ruutu, M ;
Häggman, M ;
Andersson, SO ;
Bratell, S ;
Spångberg, A ;
Busch, C ;
Nordling, S ;
Garmo, H ;
Palmgren, J ;
Adami, HO ;
Norlén, BJ ;
Johansson, JE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (19) :1977-1984
[6]   Measuring the psychosocial impact of population-based prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer in the UK [J].
Brindle, Lucy A. ;
Oliver, Steven E. ;
Dedman, Daniel ;
Donovan, Jenny L. ;
Neal, David E. ;
Hamdy, Freddie C. ;
Lane, Janet A. ;
Peters, Tim J. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 98 (04) :777-782
[7]   Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease - A prospective multicenter clinical trial [J].
Catalona, WJ ;
Partin, AW ;
Slawin, KM ;
Brawer, MK ;
Flanigan, RC ;
Patel, A ;
Richie, JP ;
deKernion, JB ;
Walsh, PC ;
Scardino, PT ;
Lange, PH ;
Subong, ENP ;
Parson, RE ;
Gasior, GH ;
Loveland, KG ;
Southwick, PC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (19) :1542-1547
[8]   COMPARISON OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN CONCENTRATION VERSUS PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DENSITY IN THE EARLY DETECTION OF PROSTATE-CANCER - RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES [J].
CATALONA, WJ ;
RICHIE, JP ;
DEKERNION, JB ;
AHMANN, FR ;
RATLIFF, TL ;
DALKIN, BL ;
KAVOUSSI, LR ;
MACFARLANE, MT ;
SOUTHWICK, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (06) :2031-2036
[9]   Prostate-cancer mortality in the USA and UK in 1975-2004: an ecological study [J].
Collin, Simon M. ;
Martin, Richard M. ;
Metcalfe, Chris ;
Gunnell, David ;
CAlbertsen, Peter ;
Neal, David ;
Hamdy, Freddie ;
Stephens, Peter ;
Lane, J. Athene ;
Moore, Rollo ;
Donovan, Jenny .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2008, 9 (05) :445-452
[10]   The effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer - A nested case-control study [J].
Concato, J ;
Wells, CK ;
Horwitz, RI ;
Penson, D ;
Fincke, G ;
Berlowitz, DR ;
Froehlich, G ;
Blake, D ;
Vickers, MA ;
Gehr, GA ;
Raheb, NH ;
Sullivan, G ;
Peduzzi, P .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 166 (01) :38-43