Indicators of the Learning Context for Supporting Personalized and Adaptive Learning Environments

被引:7
作者
Hemmler, Yvonne M. [1 ]
Ifenthaler, Dirk [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mannheim, Chair Learning Design & Technol, Mannheim, BW, Germany
[2] Curtin Univ, Data Sci Higher Educ Learning & Teaching, Perth, WA, Australia
来源
2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (ICALT 2022) | 2022年
关键词
personalized and adaptive learning environments; workplace learning; learning context; systematic review;
D O I
10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00026
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Personalized and adaptive learning environments (PALE) offer benefits for workplace learning because they can account for individual needs and constantly changing work requirements. Yet, the identification of reliable indicators for supporting trusted PALE remains a major challenge. This systematic review provides an overview of empirically investigated indicators of the learning context. Out of an initial set of 28,782 publications, a final sample of 273 key publications was identified, according to predefined inclusion criteria. The synthesis yielded 208 indicators of the learning context that were clustered into 26 dimensions. The findings show that the learning context has been associated with learning processes and outcomes in numerous included studies and should therefore be considered when designing PALE. Future research shall detect the most relevant indicators as well as design and evaluate specific learning interventions based on these indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 65
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   How does self-regulated learning influence formative assessment and summative grade? Comparing online and blended learners [J].
Broadbent, Jaclyn ;
Sharman, Stefanie ;
Panadero, Ernesto ;
Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Matthew .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 50
[2]  
Bukralia R, 2014, RESHAPING SOC ANAL C, P67
[3]   Predicting Student Performance using Advanced Learning Analytics [J].
Daud, Ali ;
Aljohani, Naif Radi ;
Abbasi, Rabeeh Ayaz ;
Lytras, Miltiadis D. ;
Abbas, Farhat ;
Alowibdi, Jalal S. .
WWW'17 COMPANION: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE WEB, 2017, :415-421
[4]   Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success [J].
Gasevic, Dragan ;
Dawson, Shane ;
Rogers, Tim ;
Gasevic, Danijela .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 28 :68-84
[5]   Attitude and Learning Approaches in the Study of General Didactics. A Multivariate Analysis [J].
Gonzalez-Garcia, Nerea ;
Sanchez-Garcia, Ana B. ;
Nieto-Libreroa, Ana B. ;
Purificacion Galindo-Villardon, M. .
REVISTA DE PSICODIDACTICA, 2019, 24 (02) :154-162
[6]  
Hoel Tore, 2018, Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn, V13, P20, DOI 10.1186/s41039-018-0086-8
[7]  
Ifenthaler D., 2015, The SAGE encyclopedia of educational technology, V2, P447, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781483346397.N187
[8]   Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: a systematic review [J].
Ifenthaler, Dirk ;
Yau, Jane Yin-Kim .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 68 (04) :1961-1990
[9]   Development and validation of a learning analytics framework: Two case studies using support vector machines [J].
Ifenthaler D. ;
Widanapathirana C. .
Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 2014, 19 (1-2) :221-240
[10]   Gender Differences in the Initiation of Negotiations: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Kugler, Katharina G. ;
Reif, Julia A. M. ;
Kaschner, Tamara ;
Brodbeck, Felix C. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2018, 144 (02) :198-222