Comparison of production decision-making models under carbon tax and carbon rights trading

被引:13
作者
Tsai, Wen-Hsien [1 ]
Lu, Yin-Hwa [1 ]
Hsieh, Chu-Lun [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cent Univ, Dept Business Adm, Jhongli 32001, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
Activity -based costing (ABC); Carbon emission mechanisms; Carbon rights trading; Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Industry; 4; 0; SHOP-FLOOR; INDUSTRY; SYSTEMS; EMISSIONS; GAS; ELECTRIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; CHALLENGES; FRAMEWORK; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134462
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Tesla, the leader in the electric vehicle industry, as of fiscal 2021, the company's intangible revenue (carbon rights trading) was $1.46 billion, of which tires are an important part of electric vehicles. Reducing carbon emissions in the production process is a direct way to protect the environment. The tire industry is under increasing pressure to reduce carbon emissions and formulate sustainable development plans. It is even more necessary to trade carbon rights to offset emissions that cannot be eliminated in operations. This study considers carbon emission mechanisms and carbon offsets and uses green mathematical programming models combined with activity-based cost and constraint theory to develop three scenarios. The tire company recycles the defective tires in the production process, in addition to adding additional income, and can reduce the cost and expense of the process. The results of the study show that the recycling of defective tires by tire companies in the production process can reduce the cost and expense of the process in addition to adding additional revenue, carbon credits can be used as a deduction for production emission control, and have a significant impact on the company's sustainable competitiveness. In addition, this study also conducted a sensitivity analysis of environmentally sustainable carbon emission reduction targets, which can provide a reference for the company's internal carbon management decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Carbon abatement with renewables: Evaluating wind and solar subsidies in Germany and Spain [J].
Abrell, Jan ;
Kosch, Mirjam ;
Rausch, Sebastian .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2019, 169 :172-202
[2]  
Almada-Lobo F., 2015, J. Innov. Manage., V4, P16, DOI DOI 10.24840/2183-0606_003.004_0003
[3]   Extensive CO2 recycling in power systems via Power-to-Gas and network storage [J].
Antenucci, Andrea ;
Sansavini, Giovanni .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 100 :33-43
[4]   Joint decisions of machining process parameters setting and lot-size determination with environmental and quality cost consideration [J].
Awad, Mahmoud I. ;
Hassan, Noha M. .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2018, 46 :79-92
[5]   Coming Out Clean: Australian Carbon Pricing and Clean Technology Adoption [J].
Bakhtiari, Sasan .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 154 :238-246
[6]   Sustainability Aspects of a Digitalized Industry - A Comparative Study from China and Germany [J].
Beier, Grischa ;
Niehoff, Silke ;
Ziems, Tilla ;
Xue, Bing .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRECISION ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING-GREEN TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 4 (02) :227-234
[7]  
Pérez JB, 2017, ADCAIJ-ADV DISTRIB C, V6, P41, DOI 10.14201/ADCAIJ2017614150
[8]   Distributional effects of a carbon tax on car fuels in France [J].
Bureau, Benjamin .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (01) :121-130
[9]  
Choudhury AKR, 2014, TEXT SCI CLOTH TECH, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-981-287-110-7_1
[10]  
CNOSSEN S, 1992, NATL TAX J, V45, P23