PGA distributions and seismic hazard evaluations in three cities in Taiwan

被引:17
作者
Wang, Jui-Pin [1 ]
Chang, Su-Chin [2 ]
Wu, Yih-Min [3 ]
Xu, Yun [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Earth Sci, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Geosci, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
关键词
Probability-based seismic hazard; Double-lognormal distribution; Three major cities in Taiwan; EARTHQUAKES;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-012-0298-y
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study first presents the series of peak ground acceleration (PGA) in the three major cities in Taiwan. The PGAs are back-calculated from an earthquake catalog with the use of ground motion models. The maximums of the 84th percentile (mean + one standard deviation) PGA since 1900 are 1.03, 0.36, and 0.10 g, in Taipei, Taichung, and Kaohsiung, respectively. Statistical goodness-of-fit testing shows that the series of PGA follow a double-lognormal distribution. Using the verified probability distribution, a probabilistic analysis was developed in this paper, and used to evaluate probability-based seismic hazard. Accordingly, given a PGA equal to 0.5 g, the annual exceedance probabilities are 0.56, 0.46, and 0.23 % in Taipei, Taichung, and Kaohsiung, respectively; for PGA equal to 1.0 g, the probabilities become 0.18, 0.14, and 0.09 %. As a result, this analysis indicates the city in South Taiwan is associated with relatively lower seismic hazard, compared with those in Central and North Taiwan.
引用
收藏
页码:1373 / 1390
页数:18
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Ang AH, 2007, PROBABILITY CONCEPTS, p[96, 112, 293]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, EV SEISM HAZ NUCL PO
[3]   Deterministic vs. probabilistic seismic hazard assessment: An exaggerated and obstructive dichotomy [J].
Bommer, JJ .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2002, 6 :43-73
[4]   Uncertainty about the uncertainty in seismic hazard analysis [J].
Bommer, JJ .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2003, 70 (1-2) :165-168
[5]   PSHA:: is it science? [J].
Castaños, H ;
Lomnitz, C .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2002, 66 (3-4) :315-317
[6]  
Chen CC, 2007, J DENT SCI, V2, P19
[7]  
CORNELL CA, 1968, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V58, P1583
[8]   Geoscience - Earthquakes cannot be predicted [J].
Geller, RJ ;
Jackson, DD ;
Kagan, YY ;
Mulargia, F .
SCIENCE, 1997, 275 (5306) :1616-1617
[9]   Statistical prediction of the next great earthquake around Tehran, Iran [J].
Jafari, Mohammad Ashtari .
JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS, 2010, 49 (01) :14-18
[10]  
Kijko A., 1990, Natural Hazards, V3, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF00144970