Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use

被引:12
|
作者
Nitsche, Joshua [1 ]
Howell, Connor [2 ]
Howell, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept OB GYN, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Dist One Hosp, Dept OB GYN, Faribault, MN 55021 USA
关键词
Cesarean section; Post-operative pain; Absorbable staples; Skin closure; INCISIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-011-2121-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
To determine if skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples at the time of cesarean section is associated with decreased in-hospital analgesic use compared to skin closure with surgical steel staples. A retrospective cohort study was performed between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2008 comparing in-hospital analgesic use after cesarean section between patients ,who underwent skin closure with surgical steel staples and subcuticular absorbable polyglycolic acid staples. Eighty-nine subjects were included in the absorbable staple cohort and 95 were included in the steel staple group. There was a 1.5-fold decrease in ketorolac use (p < 0.0001) and a trend toward decreased ibuprofen use in the absorbable staple cohort (p = 0.06). There was no difference in hydrocodone/acetaminophen use between groups (p = 0.89). Our results suggest that the use of subcuticular absorbable staples for skin closure at the time of cesarean section may lead to less in-hospital analgesic use, and thereby positively impact a patient's post-operative course. In addition, while reduced analgesic use may represent a small cost savings for each individual patient, there is the potential for significant savings when one considers the large number of cesarean sections performed in the US annually. Prospective studies will be required to assess the full impact of the use of this new skin closure technology.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 983
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use
    Joshua Nitsche
    Connor Howell
    Thomas Howell
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2012, 285 : 979 - 983
  • [2] Absorbable Subcuticular Staples Compared With Suture for Cesarean Closure A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Madsen, Annetta Madeline
    Dow, Margaret L.
    Hutz, Catherine E.
    Tessmer-Tuck, Jennifer A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 : 26S - 27S
  • [3] Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques
    Schrufer-Poland, Tabitha L.
    Ruiz, Maria P.
    Kassar, Samuel
    Tomassian, Christopher
    Algren, Stacey D.
    Yeast, John D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 206 : 53 - 56
  • [4] Incidence of Wound Complications in Cesarean Deliveries Following Closure with Absorbable Subcuticular Staples versus Conventional Skin Closure Techniques.
    Ruiz, Maria P.
    Schrufer-Poland, Tabitha L.
    Algren, Stacey
    Yeast, John D.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2016, 23 : 195A - 195A
  • [5] A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency Cesarean section
    Sharma, Chanderdeep
    Verma, Ashok
    Soni, Anjali
    Thusoo, Meghna
    Mahajan, V. K.
    Verma, Suresh
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2014, 290 (04) : 655 - 659
  • [6] A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with ‘staples’ or ‘subcuticular sutures’ in emergency Cesarean section
    Chanderdeep Sharma
    Ashok Verma
    Anjali Soni
    Meghna Thusoo
    V. K. Mahajan
    Suresh Verma
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2014, 290 : 655 - 659
  • [7] Subcuticular Suture Compared With Staples for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Aabakke, Anna J. M.
    Krebs, Lone
    Pipper, Christian B.
    Secher, Niels J.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (04): : 878 - 884
  • [8] Randomized trial of surgical staples vs subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery
    Figueroa, Dana
    Paisley, Rachel
    Chapman-Jauk, Victoria
    Szychowski, Jeffrey
    Hauth, John
    Tita, Alan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (01) : S290 - S290
  • [9] Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Hongye
    Hong, Shukun
    Teng, Hongtao
    Qiao, Lujun
    Yin, Hongmei
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (22): : 3705 - 3711
  • [10] Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial
    Madsen, A. M.
    Dow, M. L.
    Lohse, C. M.
    Tessmer-Tuck, J. A.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 (04) : 502 - 510