FACTORIAL STRUCTURE AND CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY OF THE E (EMPATHY) SCALE

被引:12
作者
Tran, Ulrich S. [1 ]
Laireiter, Anton-Rupert [2 ]
Schmitt, David P. [3 ]
Neuner, Christine [2 ]
Leibetseder, Max [4 ]
Szente-Voracek, Sara Leyla
Voracek, Martin [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Basic Psychol Res & Res Methods, Sch Psychol, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[2] Salzburg Univ, Dept Psychol, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
[3] Bradley Univ, Dept Psychol, Peoria, IL 61625 USA
[4] State Govt Salzburg, Dept Social Psychiat, Salzburg, Austria
[5] Univ Gottingen, Georg Elias Muller Dept Psychol, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE; ROMANTIC ATTACHMENT; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; SEX-DIFFERENCES; SELF; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; QUOTIENT;
D O I
10.2466/03.02.PR0.113x20z9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Empathy (E) scale has been proposed as a theoretically and psychometrically more satisfying alternative to existing self-report measures of empathy. Its four scales (facets) cover both components (cognitive vs. emotional) and both reality statuses (fictitious vs. real-life) of empathy in pairwise combinations. Confirmatory factor analyses of the E-scale in an Austrian community sample (N = 794) suggested that one prior assumption, namely the mutual orthogonality of these facets, may partly need revision; particularly, the E-scale facets seemed to reflect more strongly differences in the reality statuses than in the components of empathy. Utilizing numerous informative psychological traits, the scale's convergent and discriminant validity were examined. E-scale scores were consistently predicted by sex-related and relationship-related constructs and measures of antisocial attitudes and behavior. Among the Big Five personality dimensions, open-ness emerged as a major positive correlate of empathy. Sex and age were demographic correlates of E-scale scores (higher in women and the younger). Findings were discussed with regards to the definition and measurement of empathy.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 463
页数:23
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   What Does the Narcissistic Personality Inventory Really Measure? [J].
Ackerman, Robert A. ;
Witt, Edward A. ;
Donnellan, M. Brent ;
Trzesniewski, Kali H. ;
Robins, Richard W. ;
Kashy, Deborah A. .
ASSESSMENT, 2011, 18 (01) :67-87
[2]   The relationship between empathy and Machiavellianism: An alternative to empathizing-systemizing theory [J].
Andrew, J. ;
Cooke, M. ;
Muncer, S. J. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2008, 44 (05) :1203-1211
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, MPLUS USERS GUIDE
[4]  
APA A.P. A., 2000, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV, V4th
[5]   The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences [J].
Baron-Cohen, S ;
Wheelwright, S .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2004, 34 (02) :163-175
[6]  
Bradburn N.M., 1969, Aldine
[7]   A Tutorial on Hierarchically Structured Constructs [J].
Brunner, Martin ;
Nagy, Gabriel ;
Wilhelm, Oliver .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2012, 80 (04) :796-846
[8]   AN INDEX OF EMPATHY FOR CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS [J].
BRYANT, BK .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1982, 53 (02) :413-425
[9]  
Christie R., 1970, STUDIES MACHIAVELLIA
[10]   The hierarchical structure of empathy: Dimensional organization and relations to social functioning [J].
Cliffordson, C .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 43 (01) :49-59