Prognostic value of ductal carcinoma in situ component in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Wu, San-Gang [1 ]
Zhang, Wen-Wen [2 ,3 ]
Sun, Jia-Yuan [2 ,3 ]
He, Zhen-Yu [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Xiamen Canc Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ctr Canc, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH | 2018年 / 10卷
关键词
breast cancer; ductal carcinoma in situ; invasive ductal carcinoma; survival; prognosis; surgery; EXTENSIVE INTRADUCTAL COMPONENT; PROPENSITY SCORE; CONSERVING THERAPY; RESIDUAL DISEASE; CANCER; MARKERS; DCIS; CLASSIFICATION; EXCISION; BIOPSIES;
D O I
10.2147/CMAR.S154656
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The prognostic implication of concomitant ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) remains controversial. Our objective was to investigate whether concomitant DCIS affects survival outcomes in patients with IDC. Materials and methods: Patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer who underwent surgery in 2010-2014 were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Statistical analyses were conducted using chi(2) test, linear-by-linear association, one-way analysis of variance, Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazards regression model, and propensity score matching (PSM). Results: A total of 61,745 patients were identified, including 44,630 (72.3%), 13,559 (22.0%), and 3,556 (5.7%) patients with no DCIS component reported (No-DCIS), DCIS <25% (L-DCIS), and >= 25% (H-DCIS), respectively. Patients with H-DCIS were more likely to be younger (p<0.001), have smaller tumors (p<0.001), good/moderate differentiation (p<0.001), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive disease (p<0.001), receive mastectomy (p<0.001), and not receive radiotherapy (p<0.001) and chemotherapy (p<0.001). The median follow-up was 27 months, and the 2-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in patients with No-DCIS, L-DCIS, and H-DCIS was 97.3%, 98.0%, and 98.5%, respectively (p<0.001). Before PSM, H-DCIS was an independent favorable prognostic factor for BCSS; patients with H-DCIS had better BCSS compared to patients with No-DCIS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.674, 95% CI: 0.528-0.861, p=0.002), while the BCSS between No-DCIS and L-DCIS was similar (HR 0.944, 95% CI: 0.840-1.061, p=0.334). However, this survival advantage disappeared after PSM; there was significantly different BCSS between patients with No-DCIS and H-DCIS (HR 0.923, 95% CI: 0.653-1.304, p=0.650). H-DCIS was not associated with BCSS as compared to No-DCIS in the breast-conserving surgery (p=0.295) and mastectomy (p=0.793) groups. Conclusion: In breast cancer, patients with H-DCIS have unique clinicopathologic features compared to patients with No-DCIS. Before PSM, H-DCIS was associated with favorable BCSS as compared to No-DCIS. However, the survival advantage disappeared after PSM.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 534
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical characteristics of breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion: a narrative review
    Zheng, Jie
    Yu, Jingjing
    Zhou, Tao
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (11)
  • [32] The prognosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma in the breast: a meta-analysis
    Wu, Yun
    Zhang, Ning
    Yang, Qifeng
    BMC CANCER, 2017, 17
  • [33] Expression and mutational status of RON in neoplastic lesions of the breast: analysis of MSP/RON signaling in ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma
    Ren, Xiaoliang
    Daa, Tsutomu
    Yada, Naomi
    Kashima, Kenji
    Fujitomi, Yutaka
    Yokoyama, Shigeo
    APMIS, 2012, 120 (05) : 358 - 367
  • [34] Factors predictive of invasive ductal carcinoma in cases preoperatively diagnosed as ductal carcinoma in situ
    Koji Takada
    Shinichiro Kashiwagi
    Yuka Asano
    Wataru Goto
    Tamami Morisaki
    Katsuyuki Takahashi
    Hisakazu Fujita
    Tsutomu Takashima
    Shuhei Tomita
    Kosei Hirakawa
    Masaichi Ohira
    BMC Cancer, 20
  • [35] Molecular phenotypes of ductal carcinoma-in-situ and invasive ductal carcinoma: A comparative study
    Gupta, Shilpa
    Deka, Lopamudra
    Gupta, Ruchika
    Pant, Leela
    Singh, Sompal
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 55 (01) : 43 - 46
  • [36] Ductal carcinoma in situ in breast carcinogenesis
    Van Diest, PJ
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1999, 187 (04): : 383 - 384
  • [37] Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
    Vaidya, Yash
    Vaidya, Pradeep
    Vaidya, Tanvi
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 77 (02) : 141 - 146
  • [38] Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
    Procaccini, E.
    Ruggiero, R.
    Docimo, G.
    Iovino, F.
    Procaccini, F.
    Gili, S.
    Lo Schiavo, F.
    GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA, 2006, 27 (1-2): : 40 - 44
  • [39] Ductal carcinoma in situ: treatment or active surveillance?
    Kuerer, Henry M.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2015, 15 (07) : 777 - 785
  • [40] Impact of hormonal status on ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Outcome and prognostic factors
    Tay, Tricia Hui Chyi
    Ng, Wai Yee
    Ong, Kong Wee
    Wong, Chow Yin
    Tan, Benita Kiat Tee
    Yong, Wei Sean
    Madhukumar, Preetha
    Tan, Veronique Kiak Mien
    Lim, Sue Zann
    Sim, Yirong
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (05): : 937 - 945