Prognostic value of ductal carcinoma in situ component in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Wu, San-Gang [1 ]
Zhang, Wen-Wen [2 ,3 ]
Sun, Jia-Yuan [2 ,3 ]
He, Zhen-Yu [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Xiamen Canc Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ctr Canc, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH | 2018年 / 10卷
关键词
breast cancer; ductal carcinoma in situ; invasive ductal carcinoma; survival; prognosis; surgery; EXTENSIVE INTRADUCTAL COMPONENT; PROPENSITY SCORE; CONSERVING THERAPY; RESIDUAL DISEASE; CANCER; MARKERS; DCIS; CLASSIFICATION; EXCISION; BIOPSIES;
D O I
10.2147/CMAR.S154656
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The prognostic implication of concomitant ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) remains controversial. Our objective was to investigate whether concomitant DCIS affects survival outcomes in patients with IDC. Materials and methods: Patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer who underwent surgery in 2010-2014 were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Statistical analyses were conducted using chi(2) test, linear-by-linear association, one-way analysis of variance, Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazards regression model, and propensity score matching (PSM). Results: A total of 61,745 patients were identified, including 44,630 (72.3%), 13,559 (22.0%), and 3,556 (5.7%) patients with no DCIS component reported (No-DCIS), DCIS <25% (L-DCIS), and >= 25% (H-DCIS), respectively. Patients with H-DCIS were more likely to be younger (p<0.001), have smaller tumors (p<0.001), good/moderate differentiation (p<0.001), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive disease (p<0.001), receive mastectomy (p<0.001), and not receive radiotherapy (p<0.001) and chemotherapy (p<0.001). The median follow-up was 27 months, and the 2-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in patients with No-DCIS, L-DCIS, and H-DCIS was 97.3%, 98.0%, and 98.5%, respectively (p<0.001). Before PSM, H-DCIS was an independent favorable prognostic factor for BCSS; patients with H-DCIS had better BCSS compared to patients with No-DCIS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.674, 95% CI: 0.528-0.861, p=0.002), while the BCSS between No-DCIS and L-DCIS was similar (HR 0.944, 95% CI: 0.840-1.061, p=0.334). However, this survival advantage disappeared after PSM; there was significantly different BCSS between patients with No-DCIS and H-DCIS (HR 0.923, 95% CI: 0.653-1.304, p=0.650). H-DCIS was not associated with BCSS as compared to No-DCIS in the breast-conserving surgery (p=0.295) and mastectomy (p=0.793) groups. Conclusion: In breast cancer, patients with H-DCIS have unique clinicopathologic features compared to patients with No-DCIS. Before PSM, H-DCIS was associated with favorable BCSS as compared to No-DCIS. However, the survival advantage disappeared after PSM.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 534
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predictors for local invasive recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a meta-analysis
    Zhang, Xining
    Dai, Hongji
    Liu, Ben
    Song, Fengju
    Chen, Kexin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2016, 25 (01) : 19 - 28
  • [22] Prognostic significance of molecular classification of breast invasive ductal carcinoma
    Munoz, Mar
    Fernandez-Acenero, M. Jesus
    Martin, Silvia
    Schneider, Jose
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2009, 280 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [23] Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) at Breast MRI: Predictors of Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma
    Lamb, Leslie R.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    Oseni, Tawakalitu O.
    Bahl, Manisha
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (10) : 1394 - 1399
  • [24] Impact of Prognostic Markers on the Therapy of Ductal Breast Carcinoma in situ
    Boehm, J.
    Zikan, M.
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2011, 71 (11) : 967 - 972
  • [25] Prognostic significance of microinvasion with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a meta-analysis
    Sho Shiino
    Cecily Quinn
    Graham Ball
    Binafsha M. Syed
    Sasagu Kurozumi
    Hitoshi Tsuda
    Emad A. Rakha
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2023, 197 : 245 - 254
  • [26] Interobserver Variability in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
    Van Bockstal, Mieke R.
    Berliere, Martine
    Duhoux, Francois P.
    Galant, Christine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2020, 154 (05) : 596 - 609
  • [27] Clinical Trials for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
    Michelle S. Han
    Seema A. Khan
    Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, 2018, 23 : 293 - 301
  • [28] Clinical Trials for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
    Han, Michelle S.
    Khan, Seema A.
    JOURNAL OF MAMMARY GLAND BIOLOGY AND NEOPLASIA, 2018, 23 (04) : 293 - 301
  • [29] Genomic differences between pure ductal carcinoma in situ and synchronous ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive breast cancer
    Kim, Shinn Young
    Jung, Seung-Hyun
    Kim, Min Sung
    Baek, In-Pyo
    Lee, Sung Hak
    Kim, Tae-Min
    Chung, Yeun-Jun
    Lee, Sug Hyung
    ONCOTARGET, 2015, 6 (10) : 7597 - 7607
  • [30] A Model to Predict Upstaging to Invasive Carcinoma in Patients Preoperatively Diagnosed With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
    Kondo, Takafumi
    Hayashi, Naoki
    Ohde, Sachiko
    Suzuki, Koyu
    Yoshida, Atsushi
    Yagata, Hiroshi
    Niikura, Naoki
    Iwamoto, Takayuki
    Kida, Kumiko
    Murai, Michiko
    Takahashi, Yuko
    Tsunoda, Hiroko
    Nakamura, Seigo
    Yamauchi, Hideko
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 112 (05) : 476 - 480