Prognostic value of ductal carcinoma in situ component in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Wu, San-Gang [1 ]
Zhang, Wen-Wen [2 ,3 ]
Sun, Jia-Yuan [2 ,3 ]
He, Zhen-Yu [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Xiamen Canc Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ctr Canc, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH | 2018年 / 10卷
关键词
breast cancer; ductal carcinoma in situ; invasive ductal carcinoma; survival; prognosis; surgery; EXTENSIVE INTRADUCTAL COMPONENT; PROPENSITY SCORE; CONSERVING THERAPY; RESIDUAL DISEASE; CANCER; MARKERS; DCIS; CLASSIFICATION; EXCISION; BIOPSIES;
D O I
10.2147/CMAR.S154656
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The prognostic implication of concomitant ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) remains controversial. Our objective was to investigate whether concomitant DCIS affects survival outcomes in patients with IDC. Materials and methods: Patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer who underwent surgery in 2010-2014 were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Statistical analyses were conducted using chi(2) test, linear-by-linear association, one-way analysis of variance, Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazards regression model, and propensity score matching (PSM). Results: A total of 61,745 patients were identified, including 44,630 (72.3%), 13,559 (22.0%), and 3,556 (5.7%) patients with no DCIS component reported (No-DCIS), DCIS <25% (L-DCIS), and >= 25% (H-DCIS), respectively. Patients with H-DCIS were more likely to be younger (p<0.001), have smaller tumors (p<0.001), good/moderate differentiation (p<0.001), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive disease (p<0.001), receive mastectomy (p<0.001), and not receive radiotherapy (p<0.001) and chemotherapy (p<0.001). The median follow-up was 27 months, and the 2-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in patients with No-DCIS, L-DCIS, and H-DCIS was 97.3%, 98.0%, and 98.5%, respectively (p<0.001). Before PSM, H-DCIS was an independent favorable prognostic factor for BCSS; patients with H-DCIS had better BCSS compared to patients with No-DCIS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.674, 95% CI: 0.528-0.861, p=0.002), while the BCSS between No-DCIS and L-DCIS was similar (HR 0.944, 95% CI: 0.840-1.061, p=0.334). However, this survival advantage disappeared after PSM; there was significantly different BCSS between patients with No-DCIS and H-DCIS (HR 0.923, 95% CI: 0.653-1.304, p=0.650). H-DCIS was not associated with BCSS as compared to No-DCIS in the breast-conserving surgery (p=0.295) and mastectomy (p=0.793) groups. Conclusion: In breast cancer, patients with H-DCIS have unique clinicopathologic features compared to patients with No-DCIS. Before PSM, H-DCIS was associated with favorable BCSS as compared to No-DCIS. However, the survival advantage disappeared after PSM.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 534
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of prognostic risk factors in 3427 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of breast: Results based on the SEER database
    Zhang, Heng
    Ge, Xin-Yu
    Qiao, Hai-Quan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 44 (03) : 577 - 579
  • [2] Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound Elastography in the Differentiation of Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma and Ductal Carcinoma In situ
    Shi, Jian
    Chen, Luzeng
    Wang, Bin
    Zhang, Hong
    Xu, Ling
    Ye, Jingming
    Liu, Yinhua
    Shao, Yuhong
    Sun, Xiuming
    Zou, Yinghua
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2023, 19 (03) : 286 - 291
  • [3] Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis among patients with pure invasive ductal carcinoma, invasive ductal carcinoma coexisted with invasive micropapillary carcinoma, and invasive ductal carcinoma coexisted with ductal carcinoma in situ A retrospective cohort study
    Guan, Xin
    Xu, Guiying
    Shi, Aiping
    Zou, Yabin
    Zhan, Yue
    Fan, Zhimin
    Dong, Yi
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (50) : E23487
  • [4] Grade of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Accompanying Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma As an Independent Prognostic Factor
    Kim, Ju-Yeon
    Han, Wonshik
    Moon, Hyeong-Gon
    Park, In-Ae
    Ahn, Soo Kyung
    Kim, Jisun
    Lee, Jun Woo
    Kim, Taeryung
    Kim, Min Kyoon
    Noh, Dong-Young
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2013, 13 (05) : 385 - 391
  • [5] Effect of radiotherapy on survival of women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population-based analysis
    Qian, Guo-Wei
    Ni, Xiao-Jian
    Wang, Zheng
    Jiang, Yi-Zhou
    Yu, Ke-Da
    Shao, Zhi-Ming
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2015, 8 : 1407 - 1418
  • [6] Identification of aberrant gene expression during breast ductal carcinoma in situ progression to invasive ductal carcinoma
    Song, Guiqin
    He, Lang
    Yang, Xiaolin
    Yang, Yan
    Cai, Xiaoming
    Liu, Kang
    Feng, Gang
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (01)
  • [7] Does the Presence of Ductal Carcinoma in situ Affect Prognostic Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast?
    Zhou, S.
    Shi, Y.
    Huang, Z.
    Teng, Y.
    Xing, W.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 40
  • [8] Epidemiology of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
    Iatrakis, Georgios
    Zervoudis, Stefanos
    CHIRURGIA, 2021, 116 (05) : S15 - S21
  • [9] Prognostic value of microvessel density in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast
    Shinichi Tsutsui
    Masazumi Kume
    Shoichi Era
    Breast Cancer, 2003, 10 (4) : 312 - 319
  • [10] Comprehensive analysis of the 21-gene recurrence score in invasive ductal breast carcinoma with or without ductal carcinoma in situ component
    Zeng, Yufei
    Gao, Weiqi
    Chen, Xiaosong
    Shen, Kunwei
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 124 (05) : 975 - 981