共 50 条
Responsiveness of Migraine-ACT and MIDAS questionnaires for assessing migraine therapy
被引:11
|作者:
Garcia, Maria Luisa
[2
]
Baos, Vicente
[3
]
Lainez, Miguel
[4
]
Pascual, Julio
[5
]
Lopez-Gil, Arturo
[1
]
机构:
[1] MSD Spain, Dept Med, Madrid 28027, Spain
[2] CS Mendiguchia Carriche Primary Care, Madrid, Spain
[3] CS Collado Villalba Primary Care, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Valencia, Hosp Clin, Valencia, Spain
[5] Hosp Univ Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
来源:
HEADACHE
|
2008年
/
48卷
/
09期
关键词:
migraine;
Migraine Assessment of Current Therapy (Migraine-ACT) questionnaire;
Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire;
primary care;
treatment need;
D O I:
10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.01026.x
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background.-Migraine is frequently undertreated. The 4-item Migraine Assessment of Current Therapy (Migraine-ACT) questionnaire is a simple and reliable tool to identify patients requiring a change in current acute migraine treatment. Objective.-To investigate the responsiveness of the Migraine-ACT tool, and compare it with that of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire, for patients with migraine at 1100 primary care sites in Spain. Methods.-Patients eligible for this open-label, 2-visit prospective study reported migraine for >1 year and >= 1 migraine attack per month and were new to the clinic or on follow-up care for <6 months. Validated Spanish versions of the Migraine-ACT and MIDAS questionnaires were administered, and patient satisfaction with treatment was recorded, at baseline and at 3 months. Results.-A total of 3272 patients, 78% female, were enrolled, and 2877 (88%) returned for the 3-month visit. Investigators changed baseline migraine treatment for 72% of returning patients; 85% and 80% of these patients had improved Migraine-ACT and MIDAS scores at 3 months, respectively. Patients who reported being completely or very satisfied with migraine treatment numbered 492 (15%) at baseline and 1406 (49%) at 3 months. Migraine-ACT and MIDAS score agreement for improvement at 3 months was poor (kappa=0.339). Both the mean MIDAS score and the distribution of Migraine-ACT scores improved over the course of 3 months; however, Migraine-ACT scores were significantly (P<.001) more sensitive (83% vs 75%) and specific (72% vs 58%) than MIDAS scores. The area under the curve in the receiver-operating characteristic analysis was significantly (P<.0001) greater for Migraine-ACT (0.82) as compared with the MIDAS (0.70) questionnaire. Conclusions.-These results suggest that the Migraine-ACT questionnaire can be used more reliably than the MIDAS questionnaire for detecting improvements in treatment of new and follow-up patients with migraine.
引用
收藏
页码:1349 / 1355
页数:7
相关论文