A comparison of DNA extraction procedures for the detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of Buruli ulcer, in clinical and environmental specimens

被引:27
作者
Durnez, Lies [1 ,2 ]
Stragier, Pieter [1 ]
Roebben, Karen [1 ]
Ablordey, Anthony [1 ,3 ]
Leirs, Herwig [2 ,4 ]
Portaels, Francoise [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Trop Med, Mycobacteriol Unit, Dept Microbiol, Inst Trop Med, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp, Evolutionary Ecol Grp, Dept Biol, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Noguchi Mem Inst Med Res, Dept Bacteriol, Accra, Ghana
[4] Univ Aarhus, Danish Pest Infestat Lab, Fac Agr Sci, Dept Integrat Pest Management, Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
Buruli ulcer; Clinical specimens; DNA extraction; Environmental specimens; Modified Boom; Mycobacterium ulcerans; PCR; SEQUENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.mimet.2008.10.002
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Mycobacterium ulcerans is the causative agent of Buruli ulcer, the third most common mycobacterial disease in humans after tuberculosis and leprosy. Although the disease is associated with aquatic ecosystems, cultivation of the bacillus from the environment is difficult to achieve. Therefore, at the moment, research is based on the detection by PCR of the insertion sequence IS2404 present in M. ulcerans and some closely related mycobacteria. In the present study, we compared four DNA extraction methods for detection of M. ulcerans DNA, namely the one tube cell lysis and DNA extraction procedure (OT), the FastPrep procedure (FP), the modified Boom procedure (MB), and the Maxwell (R) 16 Procedure (M16). The methods were performed on serial dilutions of M. ulcerans, followed by PCR analysis with different PCR targets in M. ulcerans to determine the detection limit (DL) of each method. The purity of the extracted DNA and the time and effort needed were compared as well. All methods were performed on environmental specimens and the two best methods (MB and M16) were tested on clinical specimens for detection of M. ulcerans DNA. When comparing the DLs of the DNA extraction methods, the MB and M16 had a significantly lower DL than the OT and FP. For the different PCR targets, IS2404 showed a significantly lower DL than mlsA, MIRU1, MIRU5 and VNTR6. The FP and M16 were considerably faster than the MB and OT, while the purity of the DNA extracted with the MB was significantly higher than the DNA extracted with the other methods. The MB performed best on the environmental and clinical specimens. This comparative study shows that the modified Boom procedure, although lengthy, provides a better method of DNA extraction than the other methods tested for detection and identification of M. ulcerans in both clinical and environmental specimens. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 158
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Heterogeneity among Mycobacterium ulcerans isolates from Africa
    Stragier, P
    Ablordey, A
    Bayonne, LM
    Lugor, YL
    Sindani, IS
    Suykerbuyk, P
    Wabinga, H
    Meyers, WM
    Portaels, F
    [J]. EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2006, 12 (05) : 844 - 847
  • [22] Genotyping Mycobacterium ulcerans and Mycobacterium marinum by using mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units
    Stragier, P
    Ablordey, A
    Meyers, WM
    Portaels, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 2005, 187 (05) : 1639 - 1647
  • [23] VNTR analysis differentiates Mycobacterium ulcerans and IS2404 positive mycobacteria
    Stragier, Pieter
    Ablordey, Anthony
    Durnez, Lies
    Portaels, Francoise
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 30 (07) : 525 - 530
  • [24] Distribution of Mycobacterium ulcerans in Buruli Ulcer Endemic and Non-Endemic Aquatic Sites in Ghana
    Williamson, Heather R.
    Benbow, Mark E.
    Nguyen, Khoa D.
    Beachboard, Dia C.
    Kimbirauskas, Ryan K.
    McIntosh, Mollie D.
    Quaye, Charles
    Ampadu, Edwin O.
    Boakye, Daniel
    Merritt, Richard W.
    Small, Pamela L. C.
    [J]. PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2008, 2 (03):