Brain death diagnosis in misleading conditions

被引:12
作者
de Tourtchaninoff, M
Hantson, P
Mahieu, P
Guérit, JM
机构
[1] Clin Univ St Luc, Clin Neurophysiol Unit, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Clin Univ St Luc, Dept Intens Care, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
来源
QJM-MONTHLY JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS | 1999年 / 92卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/qjmed/92.7.407
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The necessity of defining brain death (BD) arose from technological development in medical science. The definition of this concept had practical consequences and opened the way to organ donation from ED patients. Nowadays, the imbalance between the number of organs available for transplantation and the size of the demand is becoming critical. In most laboratories, a ED diagnosis is made according to precise criteria and in a well-defined process. ED diagnosis should be improved, not only to assure the safety and to preserve the human dignity of the patient, but also in order to increase the rate of organ donation. By analysing some epidemiological parameters in ED diagnosis and organ donation, it appears that ED diagnoses can be made more often and more vapidly if one has a reliable, accurate, and safe confirmatory test, especially under misleading conditions (hypothermia, drugs, metabolic disturbances). In our experience, the use of multimodality evoked potentials (MEPs) to confirm a ED diagnosis has many advantages: MEPs can be rapidly performed at the patient's bedside, assess the brain stem as well as the cerebral cortex, and are innocuous for the patient. Moreover, their insensitivity to the aforementioned misleading factors is sufficient to distinguish ED from clinical and EEC states that mimic ED. They give an immediate diagnosis, and no delay is required in ED confirmation if there is sufficient cause to account for ED. MEPs are a safe, accurate, and reliable tool for confirming a ED diagnosis, and their use can improve the organ donation rate while preserving the safety of the patient.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 414
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
*AD HOC COMM HARV, 1981, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V13, P2184
[2]   Brain dead donors for organ transplantation [J].
Altinörs, N ;
Benli, S ;
Caner, H ;
Aktas, A ;
Bavbek, M ;
Bilgin, N .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (03) :771-772
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1972, Journal of the American Medical Association, V221, P48
[4]   FAILURE OF ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY TO DIAGNOSE BRAIN DEATH IN COMATOSE CHILDREN [J].
ASHWAL, S ;
SCHNEIDER, S .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1979, 6 (06) :512-517
[5]  
*C ROYAL COLL FAC, 1976, LANCET, V2, P1069
[6]  
Chatrian G., 1990, Current Practice in Clinical Electroencephalography, P425
[7]  
CHIAPPA KH, 1990, EVOKED POTENTIALS CL, P218
[8]  
De Meirleir L J, 1986, Pediatr Neurol, V2, P31, DOI 10.1016/0887-8994(86)90036-6
[9]   NEONATAL AUDITORY BRAIN-STEM RESPONSE CANNOT RELIABLY DIAGNOSE BRAIN-STEM DEATH [J].
DEAR, PRF ;
GODFREY, DJ .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1985, 60 (01) :17-19
[10]   THE PERSISTENCE OF SOMATOSENSORY AND AUDITORY PATHWAY EVOKED-POTENTIALS IN SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA IN THE CAT [J].
DEUTSCH, E ;
FREEMAN, S ;
SOHMER, H ;
GAFNI, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 61 (02) :161-164