Patient Selection for Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Importance of Benefit/Risk Assessment

被引:116
作者
Piscaglia, Fabio [1 ]
Ogasawara, Sadahisa [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, S Orsola Malpighi Hosp, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Unit Internal Med, Bologna, Italy
[2] Chiba Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol, Chiba, Japan
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Regorafenib; Sorafenib; Transarterial chemoembolization; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; CANCER STAGING SYSTEM; KONG LIVER-CANCER; LIPIODOL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; PROGNOSTIC SYSTEM; DOUBLE-BLIND; CLIP SCORE; ART SCORE; MANAGEMENT; HCC;
D O I
10.1159/000485471
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Liver cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for most primary liver cancers and most commonly arising from a history of advanced chronic liver disease. Among the available therapies, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the most widely utilized and is considered the first-line treatment recommended for patients staged as intermediate HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B). If applied correctly, TACE can produce survival benefits without adversely affecting hepatic functional reserve. Summary: The aim of this nonsystematic review is to evaluate the evidence supporting TACE, with a special interest in intermediate HCC, for which this treatment is recommended in first line. However, intermediate HCC represents a broad and heterogeneous group of patients, not all of whom will benefit from TACE. This review highlights the importance of appropriate patient selection for initial TACE and for retreatment. It also evaluates evidence for the treatment of patients who become refractory to TACE. Some patients may, in fact, benefit from early switch (i.e., after 1 or 2 TACE treatments) to systemic therapies rather than continuing retreatments with TACE in order to preserve liver function, thus allowing sequential first- and second-line drug therapies. Key Messages: Careful assessment of an individual patient's benefit/risk ratio is recommended before any TACE session is considered to ensure optimal long-term outcomes in intermediate HCC. (c) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 119
页数:16
相关论文
共 73 条
[71]   Validation of models in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of Hong Kong Liver Cancer with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system in a Chinese cohort [J].
Yan, Xiaopeng ;
Fu, Xu ;
Cai, Chuang ;
Zi, Xuejian ;
Yao, Hui ;
Qiu, Yudong .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 27 (10) :1180-1186
[72]   Development of Hong Kong Liver Cancer Staging System With Treatment Stratification for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma [J].
Yau, Thomas ;
Tang, Vikki Y. F. ;
Yao, Tzy-Jyun ;
Fan, Sheung-Tat ;
Lo, Chung-Mau ;
Poon, Ronnie T. P. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 146 (07) :1691-+
[73]   Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) plus Sorafenib Versus TACE for Intermediate or Advanced Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Zhang, Leida ;
Hu, Peng ;
Chen, Xi ;
Bie, Ping .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (06)