Patient Selection for Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Importance of Benefit/Risk Assessment

被引:110
作者
Piscaglia, Fabio [1 ]
Ogasawara, Sadahisa [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, S Orsola Malpighi Hosp, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Unit Internal Med, Bologna, Italy
[2] Chiba Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol, Chiba, Japan
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Regorafenib; Sorafenib; Transarterial chemoembolization; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; CANCER STAGING SYSTEM; KONG LIVER-CANCER; LIPIODOL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; PROGNOSTIC SYSTEM; DOUBLE-BLIND; CLIP SCORE; ART SCORE; MANAGEMENT; HCC;
D O I
10.1159/000485471
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Liver cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for most primary liver cancers and most commonly arising from a history of advanced chronic liver disease. Among the available therapies, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the most widely utilized and is considered the first-line treatment recommended for patients staged as intermediate HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B). If applied correctly, TACE can produce survival benefits without adversely affecting hepatic functional reserve. Summary: The aim of this nonsystematic review is to evaluate the evidence supporting TACE, with a special interest in intermediate HCC, for which this treatment is recommended in first line. However, intermediate HCC represents a broad and heterogeneous group of patients, not all of whom will benefit from TACE. This review highlights the importance of appropriate patient selection for initial TACE and for retreatment. It also evaluates evidence for the treatment of patients who become refractory to TACE. Some patients may, in fact, benefit from early switch (i.e., after 1 or 2 TACE treatments) to systemic therapies rather than continuing retreatments with TACE in order to preserve liver function, thus allowing sequential first- and second-line drug therapies. Key Messages: Careful assessment of an individual patient's benefit/risk ratio is recommended before any TACE session is considered to ensure optimal long-term outcomes in intermediate HCC. (c) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 119
页数:16
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [21] Hepatocellular Carcinoma Responding to Superselective Transarterial Chemoembolization: An Issue of Nodule Dimension?
    Golfieri, Rita
    Renzulli, Matteo
    Mosconi, Cristina
    Forlani, Ludovica
    Giampalma, Emanuela
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    Trevisani, Franco
    Bolondi, Luigi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 24 (04) : 509 - 517
  • [22] Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: A review of techniques
    Imai, Norihiro
    Ishigami, Masatoshi
    Ishizu, Yoji
    Kuzuya, Teiji
    Honda, Takashi
    Hayashi, Kazuhiko
    Hirooka, Yoshiki
    Goto, Hidemi
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 6 (12) : 844 - 850
  • [23] A simple prognostic scoring system for patients receiving transarterial embolisation for hepatocellular cancer
    Kadalayil, L.
    Benini, R.
    Pallan, L.
    O'Beirne, J.
    Marelli, L.
    Yu, D.
    Hackshaw, A.
    Fox, R.
    Johnson, P.
    Burroughs, A. K.
    Palmer, D. H.
    Meyer, T.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 (10) : 2565 - 2570
  • [24] The recommended treatment algorithms of the BCLC and HKLC staging systems: does following these always improve survival rates for HCC patients?
    Kim, Kwang Min
    Sinn, Dong Hyun
    Jung, Sin-Ho
    Gwak, Geum-Youn
    Paik, Yong-Han
    Choi, Moon Seok
    Lee, Joon Hyeok
    Koh, Kwang Cheol
    Paik, Seung Woon
    [J]. LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 36 (10) : 1490 - 1497
  • [25] Validation of Clinical Scoring Systems ART and ABCR after Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Kloeckner, Roman
    Pitton, Michael B.
    Dueber, Christoph
    Schmidtmann, Irene
    Galle, Peter R.
    Koch, Sandra
    Woerns, Marcus A.
    Weinmann, Arndt
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (01) : 94 - 102
  • [26] Predictors of hepatic decompensation after TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Kohla, Mohamed A. S.
    Abu Zeid, Mai I.
    Al-Warraky, Mohamed
    Taha, Hossam
    Gish, Robert G.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 2 (01):
  • [27] Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Japan Society of Hepatology 2013 update (3rd JS']JSH-HCC Guidelines)
    Kokudo, Norihiro
    Hasegawa, Kiyoshi
    Akahane, Masaaki
    Igaki, Hiroshi
    Izumi, Namiki
    Ichida, Takafumi
    Uemoto, Shinji
    Kaneko, Shuichi
    Kawasaki, Seiji
    Ku, Yonson
    Kudo, Masatoshi
    Kubo, Shoji
    Takayama, Tadatoshi
    Tateishi, Ryosuke
    Fukuda, Takashi
    Matsui, Osamu
    Matsuyama, Yutaka
    Murakami, Takamichi
    Arii, Shigeki
    Okazaki, Masatoshi
    Makuuchi, Masatoshi
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 45 (02) : 123 - 127
  • [28] Prognostic staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (CLIP score): its value and limitations, and a proposal for a new staging system, the Japan Integrated Staging Score (JIS score)
    Kudo, M
    Chung, HB
    Osaki, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 38 (03) : 207 - 215