Steps To Reduce Favorable Risk Selection In Medicare Advantage Largely Succeeded, Boding Well For Health Insurance Exchanges

被引:91
作者
Newhouse, Joseph P. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Price, Mary [3 ]
Huang, Jie [3 ]
McWilliams, J. Michael [4 ]
Hsu, John [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Div Hlth Policy Res & Educ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Interfac Initiat Hlth Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente No Calif Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA USA
[6] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Mongan Inst Hlth Policy, Program Clin Econ & Policy Anal, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[7] Harvard Univ, Comm Higher Degrees Hlth Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
ADVERSE SELECTION; ADJUSTMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0345
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Within Medicare, the Medicare Advantage program has historically attracted better risks-healthier, lower-cost patients-than has traditional Medicare. The disproportionate enrollment of lower-cost patients and avoidance of higher-cost ones during the 1990s-known as favorable selection-resulted in Medicare's spending more per beneficiary who enrolled in Medicare Advantage than if the enrollee had remained in traditional Medicare. We looked at two measures that can indicate whether favorable selection is taking place-predicted spending on beneficiaries and mortality-and studied whether policies that Medicare implemented in the past decade succeeded in reducing favorable selection in Medicare Advantage. We found that these policies-an improved risk adjustment formula and a prohibition on monthly disenrollment by beneficiaries-largely succeeded. Differences in predicted spending between those switching from traditional Medicare to Medicare Advantage relative to those who remained in traditional Medicare markedly narrowed, as did adjusted mortality rates. Because insurance exchanges set up under the Affordable Care Act will employ similar policies to combat risk selection, our results give reason for optimism about managing competition among health plans.
引用
收藏
页码:2618 / 2628
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Risk Selection and Risk Adjustment: Improving Insurance in the Individual and Small Group Markets [J].
Baicker, Katherine ;
Dow, William H. .
INQUIRY-THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION PROVISION AND FINANCING, 2009, 46 (02) :215-228
[2]  
Brown Randall S., 1993, The Medicare Risk Program for HMOs: Final Summary Report on Findings from the Evaluation
[3]  
Brown RS, 1993, DO HLTH MAINTENANCE
[4]  
Congressional Budget Office, 1997, PRED CHANG MED PAYM
[5]   Paying for health insurance: The trade-off between competition and adverse selection [J].
Cutler, DM ;
Reber, SJ .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 113 (02) :433-466
[6]  
Eggers P, 1980, Health Care Financ Rev, V1, P91
[7]  
Eggers P W, 1982, Health Care Financ Rev, V4, P55
[8]   THE ROGERS,WILL PHENOMENON - STAGE MIGRATION AND NEW DIAGNOSTIC-TECHNIQUES AS A SOURCE OF MISLEADING STATISTICS FOR SURVIVAL IN CANCER [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR ;
SOSIN, DM ;
WELLS, CK .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (25) :1604-1608
[9]   SIMULATION OF A HEALTH-INSURANCE MARKET WITH ADVERSE SELECTION [J].
FELDMAN, RD ;
DOWD, BE .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1982, 30 (06) :1027-1042
[10]  
Glied S, 2000, HANDB ECON, V17, P707