The For-Profit Postsecondary School Sector: Nimble Critters or Agile Predators?

被引:164
作者
Deming, David J. [1 ]
Goldin, Claudia
Katz, Lawrence F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
COLLEGES;
D O I
10.1257/jep.26.1.139
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Private for-profit institutions have been the fastest-growing part of the U.S. higher education sector. For-profit enrollment increased from 0.2 percent to 9.1 percent of total enrollment in degree-granting schools from 1970 to 2009, and for-profit institutions account for the majority of enrollments in non-degree-granting postsecondary schools. We describe the schools, students, and programs in the for-profit higher education sector, its phenomenal recent growth, and its relationship to the federal and state governments. Using the 2004 to 2009 Beginning Postsecondary Students (BPS) longitudinal survey, we assess outcomes of a recent cohort of first-time undergraduates who attended for-profits relative to comparable students who attended community colleges or other public or private non-profit institutions. We find that relative to these other institutions, for-profits educate a larger fraction of minority, disadvantaged, and older students, and they have greater success at retaining students in their first year and getting them to complete short programs at the certificate and AA levels. But we also find that for-profit students end up with higher unemployment and "idleness" rates and lower earnings six years after entering programs than do comparable students from other schools and that, not surprisingly, they have far greater default rates on their loans.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 163
页数:25
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, DIG ED STAT 2010
[2]  
[Anonymous], COND ED 2011
[3]   Trends in US wage inequality: Revising the revisionists [J].
Autor, David H. ;
Katz, Lawrence F. ;
Kearney, Melissa S. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2008, 90 (02) :300-323
[4]   Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores [J].
Becker, Sascha O. ;
Ichino, Andrea .
STATA JOURNAL, 2002, 2 (04) :358-377
[5]  
Bennett D.L., 2010, For-profit higher education - growth, innovation and regulation
[6]  
Breneman D.W., 2006, Earnings from learning: The rise of for-profit universities
[7]  
Cellini S.R., 2011, The Labor Market Returns to a Private Two-Year College Education
[8]   Financial Aid and For-Profit Colleges: Does Aid Encourage Entry? [J].
Cellini, Stephanie Riegg .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 29 (03) :526-552
[9]   Crowded Colleges and College Crowd-Out: The Impact of Public Subsidies on the Two-Year College Market [J].
Cellini, Stephanie Riegg .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2009, 1 (02) :1-30
[10]  
Cellini Stephanie Riegg, DOES FEDRAL IN PRESS