Application of extinction risk and conservation criteria for assessing fish species in the lower La Plata River basin, South America

被引:26
作者
Baigun, C. R. M. [1 ]
Colautti, D. [1 ]
Lopez, H. L. [2 ]
Van Damme, P. A. [3 ]
Reis, R. E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Gen San Martin, Inst Tecnol Chascomus IIB INTECH, RA-7130 Chascomus, Argentina
[2] Museo La Plata, Div Zool Vertebrados, RA-1900 La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[3] Asociac FAUNAGUA, Inst Invest Recursos Agua, Arocagua Norte, Sacaba Cochabam, Bolivia
[4] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Lab Sistemat Vertebrados, BR-90619900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
La Plata River basin; extinction risk; conservation priorities; IUCN criteria; MEGA; SUMIN; IUCN RED LIST; GREY LITERATURE; SCIENTISTS; KNOWLEDGE; STATE;
D O I
10.1002/aqc.2223
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Lower La Plata River basin contains between 160 and 260 native species depending on the river segment, with a few stretches containing locally endemic species. Extinction risk analysis for 185 freshwater fish in the lower La Plata River basin is presented for the first time on the basis of regionally standardized International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List criteria and is compared with alternative methods within the region. There were 11 threatened species (6%), of which three were considered as Endangered and eight as Vulnerable. A further three were rated as Near Threatened; while 121 (66%) were assessed as being of Least Concern, and 49 (26%) remained Data Deficient. The application of regional guidelines after using the global criteria did not change the categories established. The application of the IUCN criteria A and B presented considerable challenges because of insufficient information, with criterion C being inapplicable; whereas criterion D proved valid in five instances where endemic species were found highly restricted in geographical range and only inhabiting small streams. The use of other approaches, such as the Sum of Index (SUMIN) method and the Assessment Method of Threat Degree (MEGA), resulted in only an 11% agreement with the IUCN results for the main commercial and recreational target species. The discrepancies between the IUCN and the other methods may be explained in that the former measures the extinction risk by population decline as the main criterion, whereas the latter two put more emphasis on the assessment of intrinsic vulnerability and the threat status, with these additional criteria being incorporated in order to define conservation priorities. Further research is strongly recommended for the application and improvement of the IUCN regional criteria based on better ecological information, particularly data on non-target species inhabiting small tributaries, wetlands, and headwaters across the basin. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 197
页数:17
相关论文
共 68 条
[61]   The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation [J].
Rodrigues, ASL ;
Pilgrim, JD ;
Lamoreux, JF ;
Hoffmann, M ;
Brooks, TM .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2006, 21 (02) :71-76
[62]  
Rosa R.S., 2008, Livro vermelho da fauna brasileira ameacada de extincao, P9
[63]   Using fishers' anecdotes, naturalists' observations and grey literature to reassess marine species at risk:: the case of the Gulf grouper in the Gulf of California, Mexico [J].
Sáenz-Arroyo, A ;
Roberts, CM ;
Torre, J ;
Cariño-Olvera, M .
FISH AND FISHERIES, 2005, 6 (02) :121-133
[64]  
Tucci C. E. M., 1998, International Journal of Water Resources Development, V14, P157, DOI 10.1080/07900629849376
[65]  
Van Damme P, 2009, LIBRO ROJO FAUNA SIL, P46
[66]  
Vittar F, 2006, REV ICTIOLOGIA, V10, P1
[67]  
Weber C, 2003, CHECKLIST FRESHWATER, P307
[68]  
Zayas Marcelo A, 2007, Gayana (Concepc.), V71, P178