Surgical procedure to conserve the uterus for future pregnancy in patients suffering from massive adenomyosis

被引:103
作者
Osada, Hisao [1 ]
Silber, Sherman [2 ]
Kakinuma, Toshiyuki [1 ]
Nagaishi, Masaji [1 ]
Kato, Keiichi [3 ]
Kato, Osamu [3 ]
机构
[1] Nihon Univ, Sch Med Obstet & Gynaecol, Tokyo 1018309, Japan
[2] St Lukes Hosp, Infertil Ctr St Louis, St Louis, MO 63017 USA
[3] Kato Ladies Clin, Tokyo 1600023, Japan
关键词
adenomyoectomy; adenomyosis; dysmenorrhoea; hypermenorrhoea; uterine rupture; SPONTANEOUS UTERINE RUPTURE; LAPAROSCOPIC ADENOMYOMECTOMY; MYOMECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.09.014
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The treatment for severe adenomyosis has usually been hysterectomy, because there is no line of demarcation between diseased and normal tissue. Yet many such women wish to retain their uterus and some even wish to bear children. This report evaluates the efficacy of a new method of adenomyomectomy, where adenomyotic tissues are radically excised and the uterine wall is reconstructed by a triple-flap method, without overlapping suture lines, to prevent uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies. This is a prospective case series followed for 10 years from June 1998 to August 2008 of 104 women with severe adenomyosis verified histologically and with magnetic resonance imaging. There was a dramatic reduction in both dysmenorrhoea and hypermenorrhoea and all patients returned to having normal menstrual cycles. Of 26 women who wished to conceive, 16 became pregnant, 14 (53.8%) went to term and delivered a healthy baby and there were no cases of uterine rupture. Adenomyosis symptoms recurred in only four out of 104 cases. The procedure thus resulted in a dramatic reduction in symptoms and allowed over half of women who wished to conceive to go to term without uterine rupture. (C) 2010, Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 99
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Interdelivery interval and uterine rupture [J].
Bujold, E ;
Mehta, SH ;
Bujold, C ;
Gauthier, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (05) :1199-1202
[2]   Pregnancy outcome and deliveries following laparoscopic myomectomy [J].
Dubuisson, JB ;
Fauconnier, A ;
Deffarges, JV ;
Norgaard, C ;
Kreiker, G ;
Chapron, C .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (04) :869-873
[3]   Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section [J].
Guise, JM ;
McDonagh, MS ;
Osterweil, P ;
Nygren, P ;
Chan, BKS ;
Helfand, M .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7456) :19-23
[4]  
Hockstein S, 2000, J REPROD MED, V45, P139
[5]  
Hyama L.L., 1952, NY STATE J M, P2784
[6]   Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery [J].
Landon, MB ;
Hauth, JC ;
Leveno, KJ ;
Spong, CY ;
Leindecker, S ;
Varner, MW ;
Moawad, AH ;
Caritis, SN ;
Harper, M ;
Wapner, RJ ;
Sorokin, Y ;
Miodovnik, M ;
Carpenter, M ;
Peaceman, AM ;
O'Sullivan, MJ ;
Sibai, B ;
Langer, O ;
Thorp, JM ;
Ramin, SM ;
Mercer, BM ;
Gabbe, SG ;
Iams, J ;
Johnson, F ;
Meadows, S ;
Walker, H ;
Rouse, D ;
Northen, A ;
Tate, S ;
Bloom, S ;
McCampbell, J ;
Bradford, D ;
Belfort, M ;
Porter, F ;
Oshiro, B ;
Anderson, K ;
Guzman, A ;
Hibbard, J ;
Jones, P ;
Ramos-Brinson, M ;
Moran, M ;
Scott, D ;
Lain, K ;
Cotroneo, M ;
Fischer, D ;
Luce, M ;
Meis, P ;
Swain, M ;
Moorefield, C ;
Lanier, K ;
Steele, L .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (25) :2581-2589
[7]   Uterine rupture: Differences between a scarred and an unscarred uterus [J].
Ofir, Keren ;
Sheiner, Eyal ;
Levy, Amalia ;
Katz, Miriam ;
Mazor, Moshe .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (02) :425-429
[8]   Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy and hysteroplasty: A novel method [J].
Takeuchi, H ;
Kitade, M ;
Kikuchi, I ;
Shimanuki, H ;
Kumakiri, J ;
Kitano, T ;
Kinoshita, K .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 13 (02) :150-154
[9]   Spontaneous uterine rupture of a twin pregnancy after a laparoscopic adenomyomectomy: A case report [J].
Wada, S ;
Kudo, M ;
Minakami, H .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 13 (02) :166-168