Benefit of Temporomandibular Joint Lavage With Intra-Articular Steroids Versus Lavage Alone in the Management of Temporomandibular Joint Involvement in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Purpose: The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate, in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, the effect of lavage with or without intra-articular corticosteroid (IACS) injection on clinical temporomandibular joint (TMJ) signs and symptoms of inflammation and changes in acute inflammation as assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: Forty-one patients (mean age, 13.6 +/- 4.0 yr) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis participating in a large prospective juvenile inflammatory rheumatism cohort study (JIRcohorte) were included in this study. Clinical history, examination, and MRI were carried out at baseline and 6 months after intervention, if any. Twenty-one patients underwent lavage and IACS injection in at least 1 TMJ, 8 patients underwent lavage of at least 1 TMJ, and 12 patients were followed with no intervention. Outcomes measured were maximal mouth opening, Helkimo dysfunction index scores, pain intensity, and acute inflammation as assessed using MRI. Results: All groups showed a mean increase in mouth opening and mean decrease in pain intensity. The mean Helkimo clinical dysfunction score decreased for the 2 intervention groups but not for the control group. The mean Helkimo anamnestic dysfunction score decreased for the lavage with IACS group but not for the lavage-only group. The only statistically relevant difference was found for the Helkimo anamnestic dysfunction score comparing the lavage-only with the lavage with IACS group, with a more positive effect found in the lavage with IACS group. More than 50% of joints in each group showed no change at MRI examination. Jointswith lavage and ICAS injection showed better improvement than joints that had lavage only or no intervention. Conclusion: TMJ lavage with or without IACS injection cannot be claimed to systematically decrease pain, increase mouth opening, or resolve acute inflammation. Despite a tendency for improvement, response to this treatment is very patient dependent and can be determined by an array of other variables. (C) 2018 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons