A Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Quality of Life after Penile Prosthesis Implant: Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP) To What Extent Does the Implant Affect the Patient's Life?

被引:44
|
作者
Caraceni, Enrico [1 ]
Utizi, Lilia [1 ]
机构
[1] Civil Hosp, Dept Urol, I-62012 Civitanova Marche, Macerata, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE | 2014年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
Quality of Life; Sexual Satisfaction; Penile Prosthesis; Questionnaire; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; PARTNER SATISFACTION; EXPERIENCE; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES; SAFETY; RATES;
D O I
10.1111/jsm.12453
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionPenile prosthesis implantation is considered to be a satisfactory treatment for erectile dysfunction. Previous studies have assessed mainly prosthesis function and perioperative complications and have measured satisfaction only with regard to sexual performance. Very little, if anything, has been reported on the most relevant question: To what extent does the implant affect the patient's life? AimTo develop and validate the pathology-specific Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP) questionnaire, which evaluates patients' quality of life after penile prosthesis implantation. MethodsSixty-nine patients aged 32-82 years who received a three-component hydraulic prosthesis between 1997 and 2009 participated in the study; 47 participated in the retest of the instrument. The QoLSPP questionnaire was developed to examine general and sexual quality of life in four domains: functional, personal, relational, and social. All psychometric properties of the QoLSPP were validated. Internal validity was assessed by means of exploratory factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate the internal consistency of the items within each factor. Paired-sample t-tests were used to investigate metric stability. Independent-samples t-tests and nonparametric tests were used to evaluate the sensitivity. Main Outcome MeasuresThe main outcome measure for the questionnaire was quality of life as biological and psychosocial-relational well-being. Main outcome measures for validation were internal validity, metric stability, and sensitivity of the QoLSPP. ResultsThe QoLSPP met the psychometric requirements of internal validity and reliability. Metric stability and sensitivity were tested and confirmed. Respondents reported high satisfaction levels in all quality of life domains. All domains were significantly and positively correlated; the functional domain was most predictive of overall quality of life. More than half of respondents perceived their partners to be very satisfied. ConclusionsProsthesis implantation was correlated with high quality of life in recipients and high perceived quality of couple relationships; partner satisfaction affected patients' quality of life, self-image, relation to the outside world, and satisfaction with implant function. Caraceni E and Utizi L. A questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life after penile prosthesis implant: Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP). To what extent does the implant affect the patient's life? J Sex Med 2014;11:1005-1012.
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1012
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Outcomes Following Dental Implant Placement
    Chakraborty, Nabarun
    Almudarris, Ban A.
    Gautam, Parthsarthi
    Laddha, Rashmi
    Giri, Tapan K.
    Patel, Vishal D.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 (SUPPL 4) : S3338 - S3340
  • [32] Quantifying the Impact of Prepectoral Implant Conversion on Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life
    Seitz, Allison J.
    MacKenzie, Ethan L.
    Edalatpour, Armin
    Janssen, David A.
    Doubek III, William G.
    Afifi, Ahmed M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 153 (05) : 884e - 894e
  • [33] Penile Cancer: Managing Sexual Dysfunction and Improving Quality of Life After Therapy
    George Coba
    Trushar Patel
    Current Urology Reports, 2021, 22
  • [34] Penile Cancer: Managing Sexual Dysfunction and Improving Quality of Life After Therapy
    Coba, George
    Patel, Trushar
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2021, 22 (02)
  • [35] How does Parkinson's disease affect quality of life? A comparison with quality of life in the general population
    Schrag, A
    Jahanshahi, M
    Quinn, N
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2000, 15 (06) : 1112 - 1118
  • [36] A New Comprehensive Cochlear Implant Questionnaire for Measuring Quality of Life After Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation
    King, Nancy
    Nahm, Edmund A.
    Liberatos, Penny
    Shi, Qiuhu
    Kim, Ana H.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (03) : 407 - 413
  • [37] Quality of Life after Bilateral and Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy with Implant Reconstruction
    Klapdor, Ruediger
    Weiss, Christina
    Kuehnle, Elna
    Kohls, Fabian
    von Ehr, Julia
    Philippeit, Anja
    Hille-Betz, Ursula
    BREAST CARE, 2020, 15 (05) : 519 - 526
  • [38] A rigid external prosthesis to improve quality of life after chest wall resection
    Johnson, FE
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 1997, 4 (06) : 1335 - 1336
  • [39] Long-term evaluation of urinary, sexual, and quality of life outcomes after brachytherapy for penile carcinoma
    Gambachidze, Dimitri
    Lebacle, Cedric
    Maroun, Pierre
    Escande, Alexandre
    Bossi, Alberto
    Blanchard, Pierre
    Deutsch, Eric
    Haie-Meder, Christine
    Chargari, Cyrus
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2018, 17 (01) : 221 - 226
  • [40] Quality of life assessment in paediatric cochlear implant recipients in South India: Parental assessment and correlation with rehabilitation scores using a bilingual quality of life assessment questionnaire
    Arumugam, Senthil Vadivu
    Mathews, Sunil
    Paramasivan, Vijaya Krishnan
    Kameswaran, Mohan
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 22 (03) : 128 - 135