A Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Quality of Life after Penile Prosthesis Implant: Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP) To What Extent Does the Implant Affect the Patient's Life?

被引:44
|
作者
Caraceni, Enrico [1 ]
Utizi, Lilia [1 ]
机构
[1] Civil Hosp, Dept Urol, I-62012 Civitanova Marche, Macerata, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE | 2014年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
Quality of Life; Sexual Satisfaction; Penile Prosthesis; Questionnaire; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; PARTNER SATISFACTION; EXPERIENCE; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES; SAFETY; RATES;
D O I
10.1111/jsm.12453
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionPenile prosthesis implantation is considered to be a satisfactory treatment for erectile dysfunction. Previous studies have assessed mainly prosthesis function and perioperative complications and have measured satisfaction only with regard to sexual performance. Very little, if anything, has been reported on the most relevant question: To what extent does the implant affect the patient's life? AimTo develop and validate the pathology-specific Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP) questionnaire, which evaluates patients' quality of life after penile prosthesis implantation. MethodsSixty-nine patients aged 32-82 years who received a three-component hydraulic prosthesis between 1997 and 2009 participated in the study; 47 participated in the retest of the instrument. The QoLSPP questionnaire was developed to examine general and sexual quality of life in four domains: functional, personal, relational, and social. All psychometric properties of the QoLSPP were validated. Internal validity was assessed by means of exploratory factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate the internal consistency of the items within each factor. Paired-sample t-tests were used to investigate metric stability. Independent-samples t-tests and nonparametric tests were used to evaluate the sensitivity. Main Outcome MeasuresThe main outcome measure for the questionnaire was quality of life as biological and psychosocial-relational well-being. Main outcome measures for validation were internal validity, metric stability, and sensitivity of the QoLSPP. ResultsThe QoLSPP met the psychometric requirements of internal validity and reliability. Metric stability and sensitivity were tested and confirmed. Respondents reported high satisfaction levels in all quality of life domains. All domains were significantly and positively correlated; the functional domain was most predictive of overall quality of life. More than half of respondents perceived their partners to be very satisfied. ConclusionsProsthesis implantation was correlated with high quality of life in recipients and high perceived quality of couple relationships; partner satisfaction affected patients' quality of life, self-image, relation to the outside world, and satisfaction with implant function. Caraceni E and Utizi L. A questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life after penile prosthesis implant: Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP). To what extent does the implant affect the patient's life? J Sex Med 2014;11:1005-1012.
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1012
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sociodemographic Determinants for the Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Vascular Amputations as Determined with the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire
    Vicente Benavent, Jose
    Maria Tenias, Jose
    Pellin, Ana
    Casana Mohedo, Jorge
    Cristina Cabellos-Garcia, Ana
    Gea-Caballero, Vicente
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (08)
  • [22] A Quality Analysis of the Last Decade's Most Heavily Cited Data Relative to Outcomes After Penile Prosthesis Placement
    Chouhan, Jyoti D.
    Pearlman, Amy M.
    Kovell, Robert C.
    Terlecki, Ryan P.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2020, 17 (05): : 861 - 869
  • [23] Quality of life after intervention with a cochlear implant or hearing aid
    Contrera, Kevin J.
    Betz, Joshua
    Li, Lingsheng
    Blake, Caitlin R.
    Sung, Yoon K.
    Choi, Janet S.
    Lin, Frank R.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2016, 126 (09): : 2110 - 2115
  • [24] Social and quality of life impact using a voice prosthesis after laryngectomy
    Summers, Lizz
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2017, 25 (03): : 188 - 194
  • [25] Quality of life after surgical correction of penile deviation with the Schroeder-Essed plication
    van der Horst, C
    Portillo, FJM
    Seif, C
    Melchior, D
    Stübinger, H
    Alken, P
    Jünemann, KP
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2003, 34 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [26] How Does Quality of Life Relate to Auditory Abilities? A Subitem Analysis of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire
    Vasil, Kara J.
    Lewis, Jessica
    Tamati, Terrin
    Ray, Christin
    Moberly, Aaron C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (04) : 292 - 301
  • [27] Patient Quality of Life After Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction With Synthetic or Biological Materials
    Ohlinger, Ralf
    Alwafai, Zaher
    Paepke, Stefan
    Zygmunt, Marek
    Nawroth, Florian
    Schueler, Katharina
    Froehlich, Patricia
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (06) : 3075 - 3082
  • [28] Influence of interproximal peri-implant tissue and prosthesis contours on food impaction, tissue health and patients' quality of life
    Chanthasan, Souknilan
    Mattheos, Nikos
    Pisarnturakit, Pakaporn Pantuwadee
    Pimkhaokham, Atiphan
    Subbalekha, Keskanya
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (07) : 768 - 781
  • [29] Quality of life assessment in patients with implant-supported and resin-bonded fixed prosthesis for bounded edentulous spaces
    Sonoyama, W
    Kuboki, T
    Okamoto, S
    Suzuki, H
    Arakawa, H
    Kanyama, M
    Yatani, H
    Yamashita, A
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (04) : 359 - 364
  • [30] Implant treatment in periodontally compromised subjects—quality of life and patient satisfaction
    Kai R. Fischer
    Ina Lindner
    Stefan Fickl
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2016, 20 : 697 - 702