Low back pain: Influence of early MR imaging or CT on treatment and outcome - Multicenter randomized trial

被引:97
|
作者
Gilbert, FJ [1 ]
Grant, AM
Gillan, MGC
Vale, LD
Campbell, MK
Scott, NW
Knight, DJ
Wardlaw, D
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Radiol, Aberdeen AB2S 2ZD, Scotland
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen AB2S 2ZD, Scotland
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Econ Res Unit, Aberdeen AB2S 2ZD, Scotland
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Publ Hlth, Aberdeen AB2S 2ZD, Scotland
[5] Univ Aberdeen, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Aberdeen AB2S 2ZD, Scotland
关键词
cost-effectiveness; efficacy study; spine; CT; MR;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2312030886
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To establish whether early use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging or computed tomography (CT) influences treatment and outcome of patients with low back pain (LBP) and whether it is cost-effective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a multicenter randomized study, two imaging policies for LBP were compared in 782 participants with symptomatic lumbar spine disorders who were referred to orthopedists or neurosurgeons. Participants were randomly allocated to early (393 participants; mean age, 43.9 years; range, 16-82 years) or delayed selective (389 participants; mean age, 42.8 years; range, 14-82 years) imaging groups. Delayed selective imaging referred to imaging restricted to patients in whom a clear clinical need subsequently developed. Main outcome measures were Aberdeen Low Back Pain (ALBP) score, Short Form 36 (SF-36) score (for multidimensional health status), EuroQol (EQ-5D) score (for quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] estimates), and healthcare resource use at 8 and 24 months after randomization. Data were evaluated with analysis of covariance, ordinal logistic regression analysis, and X-2 and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Both groups showed improvement in ALBP score, but this was greater in the early group (adjusted mean difference between groups, -3.05 points [95% Cl: -5.16, -0.95; P = .005] and -3.62 points [95% Cl: -5.92, -1.32; P = .002] at 8 and 24 months, respectively). Scores for SF-36 (bodily pain domain) and EQ-5D were also significantly better at 24 months. Clinical treatment was similar in both groups. Differences in total costs reflected cost of imaging. Imaging provided an adjusted mean additional QALY of 0.041 during 24 months at a mean incremental cost per QALY of $2,124. CONCLUSION: Early use of imaging does not appear to affect treatment overall. Decisions about the use of imaging depend on judgments concerning whether the small observed improvement in outcome justifies additional cost. (C) RSNA, 2004.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 351
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rapid MR imaging versus plain radiography in patients with low back pain: Initial results of a randomized study
    Jarvik, JG
    Maravilla, KR
    Haynor, DR
    Levitz, M
    Deyo, RA
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 204 (02) : 447 - 454
  • [2] DISK-CAUSED NERVE COMPRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE LOW-BACK-PAIN - DIAGNOSIS WITH MR, CT MYELOGRAPHY, AND PLAIN CT
    THORNBURY, JR
    FRYBACK, DG
    TURSKI, PA
    JAVID, MJ
    MCDONALD, JV
    BEINLICH, BR
    GENTRY, LR
    SACKETT, JF
    DASBACH, EJ
    MARTIN, PA
    RADIOLOGY, 1993, 186 (03) : 731 - 738
  • [3] Conventional radiography, rapid MR imaging, and conventional MR imaging for low back pain: Activity-based costs and reimbursement
    Gray, DT
    Hollingworth, W
    Blackmore, CC
    Alotis, MA
    Martin, BI
    Sullivan, SD
    Deyo, RA
    Jarvik, JG
    RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (03) : 669 - 680
  • [4] Trends in diagnostic imaging for low back pain: Has MR imaging been a substitute or add-on?
    Ackerman, SJ
    Steinberg, EP
    Bryan, RN
    BenDebba, M
    Long, DM
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (02) : 533 - 538
  • [5] Influence of imaging on clinical decision making in the treatment of lower back pain
    Gillan, MGC
    Gilbert, FJ
    Andrew, JE
    Grant, AM
    Wardlaw, D
    Valentine, NW
    Gregori, AC
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (02) : 393 - 399
  • [6] A prospective, randomized, multicenter study of intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation for the treatment of chronic low back pain
    Khalil, Jad G.
    Smuck, Matthew
    Koreckij, Theodore
    Keel, John
    Beall, Douglas
    Goodman, Bradly
    Kalapos, Paul
    Dan Nguyen
    Garfin, Steven
    Bainbridge, Scott
    Khalil, Jad
    Phillips, Frank
    Wang, Jeffrey
    Munyon, Charles
    Markman, John
    Vrooman, Bruce
    Anand, Ned
    Lieberman, Daniel
    Shannon, Larry, II
    Kreiner, Scott
    Calodney, Aaron
    Yonemura, Ken
    Moore, Gregory
    Schaufele, Michael
    Rhyne, Al
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (10) : 1620 - 1632
  • [7] Osteopathic Manual Treatment and Ultrasound Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Licciardone, John C.
    Minotti, Dennis E.
    Gatchel, Robert J.
    Kearns, Cathleen M.
    Singh, Karan P.
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2013, 11 (02) : 122 - 129
  • [8] Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Home-Based Exercise on Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain The Japan Low Back Pain Exercise Therapy Study
    Shirado, Osamu
    Doi, Tokuhide
    Akai, Masami
    Hoshino, Yuichi
    Fujino, Keiji
    Hayashi, Kunihiko
    Marui, Eiji
    Iwaya, Tsutomu
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (17) : E811 - E819
  • [9] Effects of the Multidimensional Treatment on Pain, Disability, and Sitting Posture in Patients with Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    In, Tae-Sung
    Jung, Jin-Hwa
    Jung, Kyoung-Sim
    Cho, Hwi-Young
    PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 2021
  • [10] Spinal cord stimulation for predominant low back pain in failed back surgery syndrome: study protocol for an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (PROMISE study)
    Rigoard, Philippe
    Desai, Mehul J.
    North, Richard B.
    Taylor, Rod S.
    Annemans, Lieven
    Greening, Christine
    Tan, Ye
    Van den Abeele, Carine
    Shipley, Jane
    Kumar, Krishna
    TRIALS, 2013, 14